Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Buck Creek IA 01-YEL-428

mouth (Clayton Co.) to west line of S9 T93N R3W Clayton Co.

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
3 - Insufficient data exist to determine whether any designated uses are met.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/8/2019 11:27:07 AM
Updated
8/30/2019 9:59:26 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class A2
Recreation - Secondary contact
Not Assessed
Class BCW1
Aquatic Life - Cold Water Type 1
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b-c - Use potentially biologically impaired based on calibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2012
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of 2007, 2011 and 2013 DNR/SHL biological sampling.   The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses, Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses and Class HH (fish consumption) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. An updated 2019 summary of trout stream reproduction prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau was also used for this assessment.

Assessment Explanation

The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2007, 2011 and 2013 as part of the DNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project. A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI). The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2007 CBI score was 53, 2011 CBI score was 61 and the 2013 CBI score was 43. The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the CBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011. The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 1/3 times in the last 10 years (2007-2016).

DNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years in a five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had two samples collected in a five year period; however, the data were inconclusive as to whether this segment was impaired so the assessment is still considered evaluated. The 2007 CBI score was used as the tiebreaker and those data are now greater than five years old. According to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). DNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).

In contrast to the CBI results, an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in January 2019 suggests that the Class B(CW1) uses should be assessed as "fully supported". According to the updated summary, Buck Creek is in the group of Iowa coldwater streams that support natural reproduction of trout. Based on results of surveys by the DNR Fisheries Bureau, this stream is placed in the category of Iowa trout streams that exhibit recent, but inconsistent reproductive success and that are generally not capable of maintaining a viable population of Brown Trout at this time (a Category II stream).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/18/2007
Biological Monitoring
8/11/2011
Biological Monitoring
8/5/2013
Biological Monitoring
1/1/2019
Biological Monitoring
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
315
Regional reference site approach
330
Fish surveys
380
Quantitative physical habitat assessment