Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Central Park Lake IA 01-MAQ-38

Jones County S1T84NR3W 6 mi E of Anamosa.

Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trophic
Hypereutrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
5/19/2016 10:41:20 AM
Updated
12/19/2016 10:47:32 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
TMDL Priority
Tier I
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2008 Class A1 Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli Beach monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Central Park Lake are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" due to poor water transparency and aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by algae blooms. The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “full supporting.” Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed.” Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of IDNR/UHL beach monitoring from 2012 through 2014, (2) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2010 through 2014 by Iowa State University (ISU), and (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.

Assessment Explanation

Results of IDNR beach monitoring from 2012 through 2014 suggest that the Class A1 uses are "Fully Supported." Levels of indicator bacteria at Central Park Lake Beach were monitored once per week during the primary contact recreation seasons (May through September) of 2012 (15 samples), 2013 (15 samples) and 2014 (14 samples), as part of the IDNR beach monitoring program.   According to IDNR’s assessment methodology two conditions need to be met for results of beach monitoring to indicate “full support” of the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses: (1) the geometric mean of the samples from each recreation season of the three-year assessment period are less than the state's geometric mean criterion of 126 E.  coli orgs/100 ml and (2) not more than 10% of the samples during any one recreation season exceeds the state's single-sample maximum value of 235 E.  coli orgs/100 ml. If a sampling season geometric mean exceeds the state criterion of 1000 orgs/100 ml during the three-year assessment period, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “not supported.” Also, if a sampling season geometric mean exceeds the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml during the three-year assessment period and/or if significantly more than 10% of the samples in any one of the three recreation seasons exceed Iowa's single-sample maximum value of 235 E.  coli orgs/100 ml, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “partially supported.” This assessment approach is based on U.S.   EPA guidelines (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S.   EPA 1997b).

At Central Park Lake Beach, the geometric means from 2012, 2013 and 2014 were all below the Iowa water quality standard of 126 E.  coli orgs/100 ml.   The geometric mean was 14 E.  coli orgs/100 ml in 2012, 14 E.  coli orgs/100 ml in 2013 and 30 E.  coli orgs/100 ml in 2014.   The percentage of samples exceeding Iowa's single-sample maximum criterion (235 E.  coli orgs/100 ml) was 0% in 2012, 0% in 2013 and 7% in 2014.   None of these are significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore do not suggest impairment of the Class A1 uses.   According to IDNR's assessment methodology and U.S.  EPA guidelines, these results suggest "Fully Supported" of the Class A1 uses. According to IDNR’s assessment methodology and U.S.  EPA guidelines, these results suggest "full support" of the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.  

Central Park Lake Beach was assessed as "not supported" for the 2008 assessment/listing cycle.   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology 2 consecutive assessment/listing cycles without violations of the geometric mean criterion and without significantly greater than 10% of the samples violating the single-sample maximum criterion are necessary to propose delisting based on bacteria violations.  There were no violations of the geometric mean criterion for the 2014 or current 2016 assessment listing cycle and there were less than 10% of the samples exceeding the single-sample maximum criterion.   Therefore, the impairment for indicator bacteria is suggested for delisting for the 2016 assessment/listing cycle.

For the 2016 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Central Park Lake are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" due to poor water transparency and aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by algae blooms based on information from the ISU lake survey. Using the median values from these surveys from 2010-2014 (approximately 15 samples), Carlson 's (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 73, 66, and 74 respectively for Central Park Lake. According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus values all place Central Park Lake in between the Eutrophic and the Hypereutrophic categories. These values suggest high levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, very poor water transparency, and very high levels of phosphorus in the water column. The data show no violations of the Class A1 criterion for pH in 15 samples.

The level of inorganic suspended solids was low at Central Park Lake, and does not suggest water quality problems due to non-algal turbidity. The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Central Park Lake (2 mg/L) was ranked 10th among the 138 lakes by the ISU lake survey.

Data from the 2010-2014 ISU lake survey suggest a large population of cyanobacteria exists at Central Park Lake, which suggests the potential for an impairment due to nuisance aquatic life These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 91% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake. The median cyanobacteria wet mass (36.7 mg/L) was ranked 108th of the 138 lakes sampled. This median is in the worst 25% of the 138 lakes sampled. The presence of a large population of cyanobacteria at this lake suggests a potential violation of Iowa's narrative water quality standard protecting against the occurrence of nuisance aquatic life. This assessment is based strictly on the distribution of the lake-specific median cyanobacteria values from 2010-2014. Median levels greater than the 75th percentile of this distribution were arbitrarily considered to represent potential impairment. No other criteria exist, however, upon which to base a more accurate identification of impairments due to cyanobacteria. Assessments based on level of cyanobacteria will be considered "evaluated" (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence) to account for this lower level of confidence.

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported." Results of the ISU lake survey from 2010-2014 show there were 2 violations of the criterion for ammonia in 15 samples(13%), 3 violations of the criterion for dissolved oxygen in 15 samples(20%), and no violations of the criterion for pH in 15 samples(0%). Based on IDNR's assessment methodology these violations are not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore suggest (fully supported/monitored) of the Class B(LW) uses of Central Park Lake.

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring at this lake.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
6/23/2010
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/22/2014
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring