Assessment Comments
Assessment is based on results of (1) 2000 Biocriteria monitoring (Fish IBI= 62(good); BM-IBI=47(fair)) and (2) statewide survey of freshwater mussels in 1998-99.
Basis for Assessment
[Note: For the 2002 report, the previous waterbody segment for the Wapsipinicon River (IA 01-WPS-0030-1) from confluence with Little Wapsipinicon River (Chickasaw Co.) to Watsons Creek (Mitchell Co.) was split into three subsegments: (1) Little Wapsipinicon River unnamed tirbutary approximately 4 miles NNE of Bassett (Chickasaw Co.) (IA 01-WPS-0030-1), (2) unnamed tributary approximately 4 mile NNE of Bassett to unnamed tributary approximately 5 miles south of Riceville (Howard Co.) (IA 01-WPS-0300-2), and (3) unnamed tributary approximately 5 miles south of Riceville to Watsons Creek (Mitchell Co.) (IA 01-WPS-0030-3). The assessment information above applies to the original 40-mile waterbody segment (IA 01-WPS-0030-1).]
SUMMARY: The Class B(WW) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on (1) results of IDNR/UHL biocriteria monitoring in 2000 and (2) results of the 1998-99 statewide assessment of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams by Arbuckle et al. (2000). Fish consumption uses are "not assessd." EXPLANATION: Results from the IDNR/UHL biocriteria sampling in 2000 suggest that the Class B(WW) uses are "partially supported." This assessment is based on data collected in 2000 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project. The 2000 Fish IBI score was 62 (good) and the BM-IBI score was 47 (fair). The aquatic life use support assessment was changed from fully supporting / threatened (=FST) (see 2000 assessment comments) to partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the F-IBI and BM-IBI scores with biological assessment criteria established specifically for the 2002 Section 305(b) report. The biological assessment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2001. Results from the 1998-99 statewide assessment of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams also suggest a potential impairment to the aquatic life uses of this stream segment and are consistent with the assesment based biocriteria monitoring in 2000. As part of this study, sampling results from 1998 and 1999 (Arbuckle et al. 2000) were compared to results from stream sites surveyed in 1984 and 1985 by Frest (1987). In general, this comparison showed sharp declines in the numbers of mussel species ("species richness") from the mid-1980s to the late 1990s. For purposes of Section 305(b) reporting, results of this comparison were used by staff of the Iowa DNR Water Quality Bureau to assess the degree to which the aquatic life uses of the sampled stream segments are supported. This assessment included the following factors: (1) the percent change in the number of species of freshwater mussels found in the 1984-85 survey versus the 1998-99 survey and (2) the number of mussel species found in the 1998-99 survey. Greater than a 50% decline in species richness from the 1984-84 to the 1998-99 period suggests an impairment of the aquatic life uses. In addition, low species richness in the 1998-99 survey suggests potential impairment. For purposes of Section 305(b) assessment only, staff of the IDNR Water Quality Bureau used results from Arbuckle et al. (2000) to define categories of species richness for Iowa's mussel communities: less than three species indicates low species richness and "nonsupport" or "partial support" of aquatic life use; from four to seven species indicates moderate species richness and potential minor impacts (="fully supported / threatened"); more than seven species indicates high species richness and "full support" of aquatic life uses. Species richness of freshwater mussels at the two sample sites in this segment of the Wapsipinicon River were 10 and 9 in the 1984-85 period and were 2 and 6, respectively, in the 1998-99 period for a percent change of -56%. These results suggest that the Class B(WW) aquatic life uses are "partially supported." As presented by Arbuckle et al. (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen). Their study also suggested the importance of stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness. Additional monitoring is needed to better define the biological status of this stream segment. Fish consumption uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.
