Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Wapsipinicon River IA 01-WPS-343

from Harter Cr. at Independence (NW 1/4 S34 T89N R9W Buchanan Co.) to confluence with Little Wapsipinicon R. near Littleton in S9 T89N R10W Buchanan Co.

Assessment Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/20/2019 1:20:00 PM
Updated
7/29/2019 9:50:58 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2018 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Partially Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Single-sample maximum criterion exceeded in significantly > 10% of samples
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
WINOFI
Biological: low aquatic macroinvertebrate IBI
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2016
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class HH
Not Assessed
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” based on results of monitoring for indicator bacteria (E. coli).  The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of biological sampling.  Fish consumption uses remain not assessed due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this river reach.  The sources of data for this assessment are results of (1) DNR/SHL monthly ambient water quality monitoring conducted on the Wapsipinicon R.  just north of Independence at the Otterville Access (STORET station 10100001) during the period from January 2014 through December 2016, (2) DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2012, 2013 and 2014, and (3) DNR Fisheries Bureau biological (fish) sampling in 2004. 

Assessment Explanation

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 24 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2014 through 2016 at Otterville Access station were as follows: the 2014 geometric mean was 84 orgs/100 ml, the 2015 geometric mean was 57 orgs/100 ml, and the 2016 geometric mean was 194 orgs/100 ml. One of the three recreation season geometric means exceeded the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Four of the combined 24 samples (17 %) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and Iowa DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as "partially supported."

The Class B(WW1) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of DNR/SHLbiological sampling conducted from2012-2014 as part of the large river/stream nutrient sampling projects and on data collected in 2004 by the DNR Fisheries Bureau. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2004 FIBI score was 48 (fair). The2012, 2013 and 2014 BMIBI scores were 67 (good), 45 (fair) and 21 (poor). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of biological data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The non-riffle FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 44 and the artificial substrate BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 52. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (905 and 909 mi2) above the sampling sites were greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site passed the FIBI BIC in 2004 and failed the BMIBI BIC (1/3 times) in the last five years, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the sites used for the assessment don't fall in the calibrated watershed size.

Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring at Otterville Access station, however, suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 35 Ammonia samples (maximum = 0.4 mg/L), 36 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 7.4 mg/L), 35 pH samples (range = 7.1 to 8.5), 36 Temperature samples (maximum = 26.1°C), 36 Chloride samples (maximum = 29 mg/L), or 36 Sulfate samples (maximum = 36 mg/L) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to December 2016. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), the EPA guidelines allow up to 10% violations of these conventional parameters before impairment of water quality is indicated. Thus, these results thus suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.

The fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of recent fish tissue monitoring in this river segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
1/7/2014 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/6/2016 Fixed Monitoring End Date
7/17/2004 Biological Monitoring
8/6/2012 Biological Monitoring
9/3/2013 Biological Monitoring
9/9/2014 Biological Monitoring
Methods
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quantitative physical habitat assessment
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring