Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Wapsipinicon River IA 01-WPS-332

mouth (Scott-Clinton county line) to confluence with Silver Cr. in NW 14 S6 T80N R4E Clinton Co.

Assessment Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/20/2019 9:57:55 AM
Updated
7/29/2019 9:43:43 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2018 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Partially Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Single-sample maximum criterion exceeded in significantly > 10% of samples
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
WINOFI
Biological: low aquatic macroinvertebrate IBI
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class HH
Fully Supported
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that slightly exceeded Class A1 criteria.  The Class B(WW1) aquatic life are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on the results of DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2012 and 2014.  Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring.  The sources of data for this assessment are (1) the results of monthly monitoring at the DNR fixed ambient station near DeWitt (station 10820001) from January 2014 through December 2016, (2) results of LTRMP ambient water quality monitoring near the mouth of the Wapsipinicon River (station WP02.6M) from January 2014 to November 2016; (3) results of USGS ambient monitoring near DeWitt from January 2014 to September 2014 (station 05422000); (4) results of EPA/DNR fish tissue (RAFT) trend monitoring north of McCausland in 2008, 2010, and 2014, and (5) DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2012 and 2014.  Note:  Part of this assessment is also used for the next upriver segment, IA 01-WPS-0010-2. 

Assessment Explanation

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 24 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2014 through 2016 at DNR ambient station near DeWitt were as follows: the 2014 geometric mean was 106 orgs/100 ml, the 2015 geometric mean was 179 orgs/100 ml, and the 2016 geometric mean was 295 orgs/100 ml. Two of the three recreation season geometric means exceeded the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Ten of the combined 24 samples (42 %) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and Iowa DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as "partially supported."

Additionally, The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 6 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2014 through 2016 at the USGS station near DeWitt were as follows: the 2014 geometric mean was 50 orgs/100 ml, the 2015 geometric mean was 0 orgs/100 ml, and the 2016 geometric mean was 0 orgs/100 ml. None of the three recreation season geometric means exceeded the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. One of the combined 6 samples (17 %) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and Iowa DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as ""impaired"" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Also, if significantly more than 10% of the samples exceed Iowa’s single-sample maximum value of 235 E. coli orgs/100 ml, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as "partially supported." This assessment approach is based on U.S. EPA guidelines (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b).All geometric means for the recreation seasons of 2014-2016 at the USGS station near DeWitt are below the geometric mean criterion. The percentage of violations of Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion for E. coli (235 orgs/100 ml), however, is significantly greater than 10%. Thus, the primary contact recreation uses are assessed as "partially supported."

Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring at DNR ambient station near DeWitt suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 35 Ammonia samples (maximum = 0.5 mg/L), 36 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 6.5 mg/L), 35 pH samples (range = 7.5 to 8.6), 36 Temperature samples (maximum = 27°C), 36 Chloride samples (maximum = 28 mg/L), or 36 Sulfate samples (maximum = 31 mg/L) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to December 2016. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), the EPA guidelines allow up to 10% violations of these conventional parameters before impairment of water quality is indicated.Additionally, Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring at the USGS station near DeWitt also suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 9 Ammonia samples (maximum = 0.8 mg/L), 7 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 6 mg/L), 9 pH samples (range = 7.1 to 8.7), 9 Temperature samples (maximum = 26.5°C), 9 Chloride samples (maximum = 28.4 mg/L), or 9 Sulfate samples (maximum = 31.4 mg/L) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to September 2014. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), the EPA guidelines allow up to 10% violations of these conventional parameters before impairment of water quality is indicated.Additionally, Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring by the LTRM program near the mouth of the Wapsipinicon River also suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 42 Ammonia samples (maximum = 1.2 mg/L), 42 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 5.6 mg/L), 42 pH samples (range = 6.5 to 8.9), or 42 Temperature samples (maximum = 27.2°C) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to November 2016. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), the EPA guidelines allow up to 10% violations of these conventional parameters before impairment of water quality is indicated. Thus, all of these results thus suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.

In contrast to the water quality aquatic life assessment, the aquatic life assessment based on biological sampling suggests the aquatic life uses are "partially supporting". This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 2012 and 2014 as part of the DNR/SHL large river sampling project. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The index rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2012 and 2014 BMIBI scores were 28 (poor) and 56 (good). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partiallysupporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of biological data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 51. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage area (2334 mi2) above this sampling site was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site failed the BMIBI BIC (1/2), it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteriabecause the site used for the assessment doesn't fall in the calibrated watershed size.. According to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). DNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).


Fish consumption uses remain assessed as "fully supported" based on results of the 2008, 2010, and 2014 EPA/DNR or DNR fish tissue sampling on the Wapsipinicon River north of McCausland. This site has been sampled for whole-fish common carp since 1994 on an every-other-year basis as part of DNR trend monitoring. This site was scheduled for trend sampling in 2012, but drought-related low water conditions prevented sample collection. The site was again sampled, however, for the 2014 trend sampling. The results from the 2008 and 2010 samplings show low levels of the primary contaminants (chlordane, PCBs and mercury) in the composite whole-fish samples of common carp. In the 2008 samples, the levels were as follows: mercury: 0.0959 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.042 ppm. In the 2010 sample, the levels of contaminants were as follows: mercury: 0.0768 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.052 ppm. In the 2014 sample, the levels of contaminants were as follows: mercury: 0.1 ppm; total PCBs: <0.24 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.11 ppm. [Note: the high non-detect levels for total PCBs (0.24 ppm), which is above the 1 meal/week consumption advisory threshold of 0.2 ppm, resulted from high detection level (0.08 ppm) for the individual Aroclors (1248, 1254, and 1260). PCBs were reported as less than detection (<0.08 ppm) for all three Aroclors in this 2014 trend sample.] The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of support of fish consumption uses in Iowa’s rivers and lakes. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2008, 2010, and 2014 fish tissue samplings conducted at this river segment show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
1/7/2014 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/8/2016 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/18/2008 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/25/2010 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/25/2014 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/30/2012 Biological Monitoring
10/2/2014 Biological Monitoring
Methods
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
260 Fish tissue analysis
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
360 HABITAT ASSESSMENT
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring