Cox Creek IA 01-VOL-304
Alternate name(s) for this segment: Alderson Hollow
confluence with Kleinlein Cr. (S36 T92N R6W Clayton Co.) to south line of S12 T91N R6W Clayton Co.
- Cycle
- 2018
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 5/8/2019 10:55:08 AM
- Updated
- 5/8/2019 10:57:30 AM
The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed as "partially supporting" based on 2011 and 2013 DNR/SHL biological sampling data. The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses, Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses and Class HH (fish consumption) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.
The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2011 and 2013 as part of the DNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project.A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data.The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach.The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI).The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).The 2011 CBI score was 47 and the 2013 CBI score was 42.The aquatic life use support was assessed (monitored) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the CBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report.The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011.The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 0/2 times in the last six years (2011-2016). The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses, Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses and Class HH (fish consumption) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.
This aquatic life assessment is considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 DNR assessment methodology. DNR requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years in a five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the last six years (2011-2016). According to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). DNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation). However, despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 5b-v and remains on Iowa’s 2018 Section 303(d) list of impaired waters.