Cox Creek IA 01-VOL-304
Alternate name(s) for this segment: Alderson Hollow
confluence with Kleinlein Cr. (S36 T92N R6W Clayton Co.) to south line of S12 T91N R6W Clayton Co.
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 8/25/2016 10:18:34 AM
- Updated
- 11/29/2016 11:18:27 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and the presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" (IR 3a) due to the lack of data for indicator bacteria upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" (IR 5b-v) based on 2011 and 2013 IDNR/SHL biological sampling data. Fish consumption (Class HH) uses are "not assessed" (IR 3a).
The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2011 and 2013 as part of the IDNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project. A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI). The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2011 CBI score was 47 and the 2013 CBI score was 42. The aquatic life use support was assessed (monitored) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the CBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011. The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 0/2 times in the last five years (2010-2014). Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to lack of fish tissue monitoring in this stream reach.
This aquatic life assessment is considered "monitored" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”.