Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Frog Hollow (aka Volga Lake) IA 01-VOL-292

Fayette County S3T93NR8W 4 mi. NNE of Fayette.

Assessment Cycle
2002
Result Period
1998 - 2000
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 0
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-VOL-00130-L_0
Overall Use Support
Threatened
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Fully
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of (1) ISU lake survey in 2000-01, (2) ISU report on lake phytoplankton communities, and (3) surveys by IDNR Fisheries Bureau.

Basis for Assessment

The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting."  The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting / threatened."  Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed."  The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) information on plankton communities at Iowa lakes in 2000 from Downing et al.  (2002).   EXPLANATION:  Results from the ISU statewide survey of Iowa lakes suggest that the Class A uses of Volga Lake are "fully supported."  Using the median values from this survey in 2000 and 2001 (approximately six samples), Carlson's (1977) trophic state indices for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and secchi depth are 67, 48, and 42, respectively.   According to Carlson (1977), the index value for total phosphorus places this lake in the range between eutrophic and hyper-eutrophic lakes; the index value for chlorophyll-a is in the upper range of  mesotrophic lakes, and the index value for secchi depth is in the lower range of mesotrophic lakes.   These index values suggest that, despite the moderately high levels of phosphorus, the production of suspended algae is extremely low and water transparency is exceptional for Iowa lakes.   These results suggest that this lake does not have impairments due to aesthetically objectionable blooms of algae.   According to Carlson (1991), the occurrence of a high TSI value for total phosphorus with relatively low values for chlorophyll-a and secchi depth indicate that some factor (e.g., nitrogen limitation or zooplankton grazing) limits production of algae.   Based on median values from ISU sampling in 2000 and 2001, the ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus for Volga Lake is 52.0.   This ratio does not suggest that algal production at this lake is limited by nitrogen availability.   The levels of inorganic suspended solids at this lake are very low and do not suggest the potential for impairing designated uses.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids in the 130 lakes sampled for the ISU lake survey in 2000 and 2001 was 5.27 mg/l; the median level at Volga Lake was 1.6 mg/l.   This median level is the 8th lowest of the 130 lakes sampled.   This lake does not appear to have problems due to presence of nuisance algal species (i.e., bluegreen algae).   Data from Downing et al.  (2002) suggest that bluegreen algae (Cyanophyta) comprise a relatively small portion of the summertime phytoplankton community of this lake.   Sampling in 2000 showed that bluegreen algae comprised approximately 30% of the wet mass of the phytoplankton community; this percentage declined to approximately 10% by the mid-September sampling.   Although results of ISU lake monitoring in 2000 and 2001 suggest threats to full support of the designated beneficial uses of this lake, the amount of data available for characterizing water quality is not sufficient for developing an accurate assessment of support of these uses.   Additional data for this lake are being generated as part of the ongoing ISU lake survey; these data will be used to improve the accuracy of future water quality assessments.   The slightly eutrophic conditions at this lake, along with information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, suggest that the Class B(LW) aquatic life uses should be assessed as "fully supported / threatened" due to siltation impacts in the lake.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring at this lake.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/7/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
7/6/2000 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Siltation Overall Use Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Not Impairing
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Not Impairing