Volga River IA 01-VOL-289
mouth (S36 T92N R4W Clayton Co.) to confluence with Cox Cr. in S21 T92N R5W Clayton Co.).
- Cycle
- 2022
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 12/6/2021 2:01:56 PM
- Updated
- 12/21/2021 3:07:32 PM
The Class A1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceeded Iowa’s water quality standards. The Class BWW1 use was assessed as "fully supported" based on biological sampling data and on water quality monitoring data. All other designated uses were "not assessed". Note: A TMDL for pathogen indicators in this segment of the Volga River was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in 2006. Because the primary Section 303(d) impairment identified for the 2006 IR cycle (indicator bacteria) was addressed by the TMDL, the Class A use was moved from IR Category 5a from the 2004 IR cycle to IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved) for the 2006 cycle.
Data Sources: Data Source Data Source ID Data Type Data Age Site ID Site Name Site Description Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2018-2020 10220002 Volga River near Elkport
Iowa DNR 6 BIO See Below 283 Volga River Elkport Site ID Data Source ID # Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020) 2018 Geometric Mean 2019 Geometric Mean 2020 Geometric Mean Violates Annual Geometric Mean? # 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations
needed for impairment # 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations
needed for impairment # 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations
needed for impairment Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10%
Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 10220002 6 7/5/8 916 182 127 YES 5 / 3 1 / NA 2 / 3 YES Monitored Not Site ID Data Source ID # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 10220002 6 36 / 3 6.6 8.4 8.1 0 7 NO Monitored Full Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations # Acute / Chronic Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 10220002 6 Ammonia 36 / 3 0.02 0.21 0.04 NA 0 / 0 7 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Chloride 36 / 3 5 17 11 NA 0 / 0 7 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Dissolved Oxygen 36 / 3 7.7 14 10.6 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 pH 36 / 3 6.6 8.4 8.1 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Sulfate 36 / 3 6.5 23 15.4 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Temperature 36 / 3 0.3 26.2 11.5 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Maximum Value Mean Value Median Value # Acute / Chronic Violations >1 Acute / Chronic Violation Assessment Type Support Level 10220002 6 Aluminum 14 / 3 10 1.7 0.48 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Arsenic 13 / 3 1 0.6 0.55 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Cadmium 13 / 3 0.025 0.025 0.025 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Chromium 13 / 3 1.5 1.1 1.1 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Lead 13 / 3 0.86 0.16 0.1 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Nickel 13 / 3 3.5 2.3 2.1 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Silver 13 / 3 0.025 0.025 0.025 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10220002 6 Zinc 13 / 3 2 1.47 1.5 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full Class BWW1 - Biological Sampling: Site
ID Date Drainage
Area (mi2) Ecoregion Major
Drainage BM
Sample Gear BMIBI
score BMIBI
Class 52b
BMIBI BIT BMIBI
Pass/Fail 283 8/31/20 403 52b MS Art
Sub 60 Good 61 Pass Overall: Community Assessment
Type Assessment
Result Support
Level IR
Category Reason Benthic Macroinvertebrates Evaluated Pass
(1/1) Full The BMIBI score passed using the 8 point UAV applied to
single samples. Overall Evaluated Pass Full 1 The assessment was evaluated because it was based on a
single sample.
Class HH - No Data
Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:
Class A - pH
Class BWW1 - Conventional Parameters:
Class BWW1 - Toxic Parameters:
Benthic Macroinvertebrates: