Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Coldwater Creek IA 01-UIA-280

mouth (S32 T100N R9W Winneshiek Co.) to north line of S31 T100N R9W Winneshiek Co.

Assessment Cycle
2012
Result Period
2008 - 2010
Designations
Class A1 Class A2 Class B(CW1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5p
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-UIA-0390_0
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Secondary Contact Recration
Fully
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) the results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 9 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project from April 2008 through October 2010 (2) results of IDNR/SHL biological monitoring in 2007 and 2011, and (3) an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau in February 2011.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(CW) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, this segment is also now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for coldwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(CW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses)).]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceed state water quality criteria.   The presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses, however, are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of biological monitoring 2007 and 2011 and an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in February 2011.   Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.   The sources of data for this assessment include (1) the results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 9 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project (STORET No.   NEIARCD 191910003) from April 2008 through October 2010, (2) results of DNR/SHL biological monitoring in 2007 and 2011 and (3) an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in February 2011.  

EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as impaired due to violations of Iowa’s water quality criteria for indicator bacteria.   The presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses, however, remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as not supported based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria while the Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses are assessed as "fully supported".   The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E.  coli) in the 21 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2008 through 2010 at UIRW Site 9 were as follows:  the 2008 geometric mean was 196 orgs/100 ml, the 2009 geometric mean was 118 orgs/100 ml and the 2010 geometric mean was 216 orgs/100 ml.   Two of the three geometric means (2008 and 2010) slightly exceed the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml; the 2009 geometric mean was below the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml.   All three geometric means are far below the Class A2 geometric mean criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml.   Nine of the 21 samples (45%) exceeded the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml; only one of the 21 samples (5%) exceeded the Class A2 single-sample maximum criterion of 2,880 orgs/100 ml.   According to U.S.  EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean exceeds the respective water quality criterion, the contact recreation uses are "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S.  EPA 1997b).   Thus, the presumptive Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported.”  

The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2007 and 2011 as part of the IDNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project.   A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI).   The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2007 CBI score was 81 and the 2011 CBI score was 81.   The aquatic life use support was assessed (monitored) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the CBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011.  The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 2/2 times in a five-year period (2007-2011).  

In addition, based on an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in February 2011, the Class B(CW1) uses are assessed as "fully supported".   According to the updated summary, (Unnamed) Cold Water Creek is in the group of Iowa coldwater streams that supports natural reproduction of trout.   Based on results of surveys by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, this stream is placed in the category of Iowa trout streams that exhibit fairly consistent natural reproduction and maintain a viable population of the listed species without any stocking for one species of trout and in the category of streams that exhibit recent, but inconsistent reproductive success and that are generally not capable of maintaining a viable population for the resident trout species at this time for a second species of trout.   This assessment is consistent with previous assessments of the ability of this stream to support natural reproduction of trout.  

Fish consumption uses remain ”not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/16/2011 Biological Monitoring
2/1/2011 Biological Monitoring
10/5/2010 Fixed Monitoring End Date
4/1/2008 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
7/16/2007 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation Slight
  • Source Unknown
  • Slight