Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Waterloo Creek IA 01-UIA-253

mouth (S35 T100N R6W Allamakee Co.) to IA/MN state line (S9 T100N R6W Allamakee Co.)

Assessment Cycle
2010
Result Period
2006 - 2008
Designations
Class A1 Class A2 Class B(CW1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5p
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-UIA-0180_0
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Secondary Contact Recration
Fully
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on: (1) results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 26 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project from April 2004 through October 2006, (2) results of IDNR/UHL biological (REMAP) monitoring in 2003 and (3) an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in May 2006.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(CW) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.   EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is also now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for coldwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(CW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses)).]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceed state water quality criteria.   The presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of biological monitoring in 2003.   Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.   Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 26 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project (STORET No.  NEIARCD 190050003) from April 2004 through October 2006, (2) results of DNR/UHL biological (REMAP) monitoring in 2003, and (3) results of a 2006 trout reproduction survey.  

EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as ”not supported” due to violations of Iowa’s water quality criteria for indicator bacteria.   The presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses, however, remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  The geometric mean of E.   coli in the 21 samples collected at UIRW site 26 during the recreational seasons of 2004 through 2006 was 153 orgs/100 ml.   This geometric mean slightly exceeds the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml but is far below the Class A2 criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml.   Eight of the 21 samples (38%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.; only 1 of the 21 samples (5%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A2 single-sample maximum criterion (2,880 orgs/100 ml.).   According to U.S.   EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean of E.   coli is greater than the applicable state criterion, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S.   EPA 1997b).   Thus, the results from UIRW site 26 suggest that the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “not supported.”  In terms of Class A2 criteria, however, the geometric mean is well below the Class A2 geometric mean criterion; thus suggesting that the Class A2 uses should be assessed as “fully supported.”  

The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2003 as part of the DNR/UHL stream REMAP project.   A series of eight (8) coldwater biological indicators, which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity, were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data and supplemental IDNR Fisheries Bureau data.   The coldwater biological indicators are based on the numbers and types of coldwater benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   Sites that score 5-8 are Fully Supporting (FS), sites that score 2-4 are Partially Supporting (PS), and sites that score 0-1 are Not Supporting (NS).   The 2003 coldwater indicator scores were 7/8 and 8/8.   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the coldwater biological indicator score with biological assessment criteria established for this Section 305(b) report.   The coldwater biological indicators were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008 and with assistance from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.  

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.   IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years between 2004 and 2008 to be considered “monitored”.   This segment had multiple samples collected in 2003; however, the samples were not collected in multiple years and were collected earlier than 2004.   Despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody was placed in IR Category 2a.

In addition, an updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in May 2006, also suggests the Class B(CW1) uses are "fully supported".   According to the updated summary, Waterloo Creek is in the group of Iowa coldwater streams that supports natural reproduction of trout.   Based on results of surveys by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, this stream is placed in the category of Iowa trout streams that exhibit fairly consistent natural reproduction and maintain a viable population of the listed species without any stocking.   This assessment is consistent with previous assessments of the ability of this stream to support natural reproduction of trout.  

Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this assessment segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
10/3/2006 Fixed Monitoring End Date
5/1/2006 Biological Monitoring
4/27/2004 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
10/8/2003 Biological Monitoring
7/28/2003 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Excellent
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation High
  • Source Unknown
  • High