Assessment Comments
Assessment is based on results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 28 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project from April 2004 through October 2006.
Basis for Assessment
[Note: Prior to the current (2008) Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(CW) aquatic life uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is also now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses. This segment remains designated for coldwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(CW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption) uses). This stream segment also remains identified as an “HQR” (high quality resource) water.]
SUMMARY: The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and the presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses are both assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceed state water quality criteria. The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of water quality information upon which to base an assessment. Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this assessment segment. The source of data for this assessment is the results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 28 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project from April 2004 through October 2006.
EXPLANATION: Both the presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and the presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses were assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to violations of Iowa’s water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. Due to recent changes in Iowa’s Water Quality Standards, Iowa’s assessment methodology for indicator bacteria has changed. Prior to 2003, the Iowa WQ Standards contained a high-flow exemption for the Class A1 criterion for indicator bacteria (fecal coliforms) designed to protect primary contact recreation uses: the water quality criterion for fecal coliform bacteria (200 orgs/100 ml) did not apply "when the waters [were] materially affected by surface runoff." Due to a change in the Standards in July 2003, E. coli is now the indicator bacterium, and the high flow exemption was eliminated and replaced with language stating that the Class A criteria for E. coli apply when Class A1, A2, or A3 uses “can reasonably be expected to occur.” Because the IDNR Technical Advisory Committee on WQ Standards could not agree on what flow conditions would define periods when uses would not be reasonably expected to occur, all monitoring data generated for E. coli during the assessment period, regardless of flow conditions during sample collection, will be considered for determining support of Class A uses for purposes of Section 305(b) assessments and Section 303(d) listings.
The geometric mean of E. coli in the 21 samples collected at UIRW site 28 during the recreational seasons of 2004 through 2006 was 2,050 orgs/100 ml. This geometric mean far exceeds both the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml and the Class A2 criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml. Twenty of the 21 samples (95%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.; 8 of the 21 samples (38%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A2 single-sample maximum criterion (2,880 orgs/100 ml.). According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean of E. coli is greater than the applicable state criterion, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because the geometric mean for UIRW site 28 exceeds both the Class A1 and Class A2 criteria, these uses are assessed as “not supported.”
The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses and the fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of water quality information upon which to base an assessment.
