Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Upper Iowa River IA 01-UIA-237

from Lane's Bridge (NW 1/4 S31 T100N R4W Allamakee Co.) to confluence with Canoe Cr. in S25 T99N R7W Winneshiek Co.

Assessment Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/12/2016 9:43:28 AM
Updated
11/21/2016 3:03:49 PM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2016 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Partially Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
Fully Supported
Class HH
Partially Supported
Fish Consumption Advisory: Mercury
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Fish consumption advisory in effect: no more than 1 meal/week
Data Source
Fish contaminant monitoring: Iowa DNR
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” (IR 5a) due to high levels of indicator bacteria that exceed state water quality criteria.  The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" (IR 2a).  Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” (IR 5a) based on high levels of mercury in fish samples and based on the resultant issuance and continuance of a fish consumption advisory for this segment of the Upper Iowa River.  Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of IDNR/SHL ambient monthly water quality monitoring conducted on the Upper Iowa River near Dorchester (station 10030001) during the period January 2012 through December 2014, (2) results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Upper Iowa River Watershed project Site 30 near New Albin (STORET No.  NEIARCD 190050008) from April 2012 through October 2014, (3) results of IDNR/SHL biological monitoring in 2005, 2012, 2013 and 2014, and (5) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring in 2004, 2006 and 2010. 

Assessment Explanation

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E coli) that exceed state water quality criteria.  Twenty-four samples were analyzed at the IDNR/SHL ambient water quality monitoring station near Dorchester (STORET station 10030001) and 20 samples were analyzed at the Upper Iowa River Watershed Project site 30 near New Albin (STORET station 190050008).  Recreation season (March-November) geometric means based on the 24 samples from the IDNR ambient monitoring station near Dorchester very slightly exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 water quality criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml.  The 2012 and 2013 geometric means (43 and 100 orgs/100 ml, respectively) were below the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100ml, and the 2014 geometric mean (127 orgs/100ml) very slightly exceeded this criterion.  Five of the 24 samples (21%) exceeded Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.  Thus, the bacteria data for this station from 2010-12 indicate that only the geometric mean from 2014 suggests impairment of the Class A1 uses and then only very slightly. 

The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 20 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2012 through 2014 at Upper Iowa River Watershed project Site 30 near New Albin also slightly exceeded the Iowa water quality criterion to protect primary contact recreation uses.  The 2012 recreation season geometric mean of seven samples was 91 orgs/100 ml, the 2013 geometric mean of six samples was 405 orgs/100 ml, and the 2014 geometric mean of seven samples was 196 orgs/100 ml.  Levels of E. coli in six of the combined 20 samples (30%) exceeded Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b).  Thus, the violations of the Class A1 geometric mean criterion in the recreation seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Upper Iowa River Watershed project Site 30 suggest that the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “impaired”.  Regardless, the 2012-2014 data continue to suggest very low levels of indicator bacteria in this river segment. 

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported."  Similar to the previous (2010, 2012 and 2014) assessment cycles, none of the 36 samples from the IDNR/SHL station analyzed from January 2012 through December 2014 for conventional pollutants and ammonia exceeded a state Class B(WW) criterion.  Similarly, no violations of Class B(WW1) criteria for ph (14 samples), tempterature (14 samples) or ammonia (six samples) occurred at Upper Iowa River Watershed project Site 30.  These results suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. 

Similarly, the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting" based on data collected in 2005, 2012, 2013 and 2014 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream biocriteria and REMAP projects.  A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.  The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach.  The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).  The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).  The 2005 REMAP FIBI scores were 57 (good) and 82 (excellent).  The 2012, 2013 and 2014 BMIBI scores were 69, 70, 70, 72, 72 (all good) and 81 (excellent).  The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008.  The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 52 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 61.  This segment passed the FIBI BIC 2/2 times in 2005 and passed the BMIBI BIC 6/6 times in the last five years.  This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (768 and 897 mi2) above the sampling sites was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria.  Even though this site passed both the FIBI and BMIBI BICs, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the sites used for the assessment don't fall in the calibrated watershed size.  

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Dorchester in 2004, 2006, and 2010.  The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.  The composite samples of fillets from the 2004 samples of common carp and smallmouth bass had generally low levels of contaminants.  Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.228 ppm; total PCBs:  0.13 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.  Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of smallmouth bass fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.486 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.  The levels of mercury in 2004 samples of both common carp and smallmouth bass exceed the IDNR/IDPH trigger level of 0.30 ppm for a one meal per week consumption advisory:  the level of mercury in the sample of common carp fillets was 0.228 ppm and in the sample of smallmouth bass fillets was 0.486 ppm. 

The composite samples of fillets from the 2006 RAFT samples of golden redhorse (Moxostoma erythrurum) and smallmouth bass had similarly high levels of mercury.  The level of mercury in the composite sample of golden redhorse fillets was 0.362 ppm, and the level of mercury in the composite sample of smallmouth bass fillets was 0.37 ppm.  According to the IDNR/IDPH advisory protocol, if two consecutive samplings show that contaminant levels are above an advisory trigger level in fillet samples, a consumption advisory will be issued.  Because levels of mercury in both the 2004 and 2006 samples of smallmouth bass exceed the IDNR/IDPH trigger level of 0.30 ppm for a one meal per week consumption advisory, a consumption advisory was issued for this segment by IDNR in March 2008.  Because level of mercury in the sample of the bottom-feeding golden redhorse was also greater than the advisory level, all species were included in the one-meal/week advisory.  The existence of a one-meal/week consumption advisory for this assessment segment suggests that the fish consumption uses are “partially supported.”  This advisory extends from the Lower Dam in eastern Winneshiek County upriver to County Road W20 approximately 5.5 miles upriver from Decorah.  Follow-up sampling was conducted at the Upper Iowa River near Dorchester in 2010.  The level of mercury in samples of golden redhorse fillets (0.318 ppm) and smallmouth bass fillets (0.392 ppm) were both above the advisory trigger level therefore suggesting that the fish consumption advisory should remain at this river segment.

 

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/23/2004 Fish Tissue Monitoring
7/12/2006 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/26/2010 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/24/2005 Biological Monitoring
10/6/2005 Biological Monitoring
9/11/2012 Biological Monitoring
1/5/2012 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/3/2014 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/11/2013 Biological Monitoring
10/8/2014 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
260 Fish tissue analysis
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quantitative physical habitat assessment
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring