Ashton Creek IA 06-LSR-2048
from tributary(T89N R41W Sec3 Ida Co.) to headwaters (T88N R41W Sec2) Ida Co.
- Cycle
- 2018
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 7/26/2019 8:32:39 AM
- Updated
- 7/26/2019 8:35:03 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remains assessed (evaluated) as “not supporting” based on biological and water quality data collected in 2006 as part of the DNR/SHL stream REMAP project.
A dissolved oxygen and temperature continuous monitoring instrument was deployed in the stream for 9 days in July/August 2006. The data logger recorded an early morning dissolved oxygen level of 3 mg/L, which is substantially less than the instantaneous criterion of 4 mg/L for Class B(WW1) streams. Also, a precipitous drop in d.o. to near 0 mg/L was observed, which was accompanied by an elevated ammonia level of 6.1 mg/L on August 3, 2006. This water quality evidence of presumptive Class B(WW1) impairment is considered "evaluated" rather than "monitored" because the data were obtained from limited short-term sampling. Additionally, a series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2006 FIBI score was 1 (poor) and the BMIBI scores were 20, 26 (both poor). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as not supporting (=NS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 43 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 54. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 0/1 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 0/2 times in 2006. Even though this site failed both the FIBI and BMIBI BICs, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small headwater stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size. This assessment is considered “evaluated” (of lower confidence) due to the lack of a biological assessment protocol for headwater streams. Prior to the changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008, this stream was classified only for general uses due to the inability of the stream to support a viable aquatic community at low-flow conditions. DNR’s existing biological assessment protocol, however, was calibrated to aquatic life reference conditions in larger wadeable streams with perennial flow. The aquatic environment of most headwater streams is one of extremes in water quality. Consequently, intermittent headwater streams tend to have biological diversity that is low relative to more stable aquatic environments of larger streams with perennial flow. Thus, the use of biological assessment methods developed for the ecologically more stable and diverse streams will likely overstate the existence of impairment in headwater streams. For these reasons, headwater stream reaches that show a failure to meet regional expectations for aquatic biota (fish or aquatic macroinvertebrates) will not be added to Iowa’s Section 303(d) list of impaired waters (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). The assessment type for these assessed waters will be considered "evaluated" (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to “monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively high confidence). Such waters will be placed in either Category 2b or 3b of the IR and thus will be added to the state’s list of “waters in need of further investigation”.