Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Rathbun Reservoir - Chariton Arm IA 05-CHA-2028

from main lake basin (state highway 142) uplake to inflow of the Chariton River at the Wayne/Lucas county line.

Cycle
2020
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
9/2/2020 12:43:39 PM
Updated
10/15/2020 11:15:49 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Delisted
Source
Other: Sediment Resuspension
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Cycle Delisted
2020
Delisting Rationale
TMDL preparation and approval
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Corps of Engineers/Iowa DNR-Lakes
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 1
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Delisted
Source
Other: Sediment Resuspension
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Cycle Delisted
2020
Delisting Rationale
TMDL preparation and approval
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Corps of Engineers/Iowa DNR-Lakes
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 uses of the Chariton Arm are assessed (monitored) as “not supporting” due to very poor water transparency caused by algal and non-algal turbidity that violates Iowa’s narrative water quality standard protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions. The Class BWW1 uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported” due to impacts of water quality (poor transparency) on the reservoir’s fish populations. All other designated uses are “not assessed.” Note: A TMDL for turbidity at four segments of Rathbun Lake was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in 2019. Because all Section 303(d) impairments identified for the current assessment/listing cycle are addressed by the TMDL, this waterbody is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).

Assessment Explanation

Sources of Data:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

USACE

12

WQ

CY 2014-2018

99990024

Chariton River Bay (RA-7) in the Chariton Arm of the reservoir


Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data


Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

99990024

12

11 / 3

8.96

8.2

8.1

0

0%

NO

Monitored

Full


Class A1 - Lake TSI's

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

99990024

12

Chlorophyll a TSI

24 / 5

23

70

57

NO

Monitored

Full

99990024

12

Secchi TSI

42 / 5

59

89

74

YES

Monitored

Not


Class BWW1 - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

99990024

12

Dissolved oxygen

6 / 1

11.06

8.43

8.15

NA / 0

NA / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

pH

11 / 3

8.96

8.2

8.1

0 / NA

0% / NA

NO

Monitored

Full

99990024

12

Temperature

28 / 5

29.7

22.6

23.5

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

>1 Acute / Chronic Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

99990024

12

Arsenic

2 / 2

4.1

3.6

3.6

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Cadmium

1 / 1

1

1

1

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Chromium

1 / 1

2.5

2.5

2.5

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Copper

2 / 2

5

5

5

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Lead

2 / 2

38.5

20

20

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Mercury

2 / 2

4.7

2.4

2.4

1 / 1

50%/50%

NA

Evaluated

NA

99990024

12

Nickel

1 / 1

7.5

7.5

7.5

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Selenium

1 / 1

0.4

0.4

0.4

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Zinc

1 / 1

3.5

3.5

3.5

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full


Class BWW1 - Additional Information:

The Class BWW1 aquatic life uses of this arm of Rathbun Reservoir are assessed as "partially supported" due to the impact or poor water quality (water transparency) on the lake’s fish populations. A comparison of water quality data to production of the primary sport fish at Rathbun Reservoir (crappie) suggests only “partial support” of the aquatic life uses of the Chariton Arm. In 2006, the DNR Fisheries Bureau summarized approximately 35 years of data on abundance of crappies at Rathbun Reservoir. These data were combined with the available water quality data (707 Secchi depth readings) from that period to determine the spatial and temporal differences in crappie abundance and water quality conditions within Rathbun Reservoir.


Based on the Secchi depth readings and the analysis of crappie production for the period 1970-2006, the best water clarity and crappie production occurs near the dam and in central portion of the main lake basin where Secchi depths average approximately one meter. Of the main arms of the reservoir, the Honey Creek Arm typically has the best crappie production and best water transparency (average Secchi depth of 0.66 m), followed by the Buck Creek and Chariton arms (average of 0.5 m), and South Fork Chariton arm (average of 0.3 m). The poorest crappie production occurs in the Chariton and South Fork arms. The reduced water transparencies and relatively poor crappie production in the arms of the reservoir is attributed primarily to greater influence of nonpoint source runoff from the reservoir’s watershed on the water quality in the reservoir’s arms. Additional sources of turbidity in the reservoir’s arms include re-suspension of bottom sediments and wave action. In summary, results of the analysis of fisheries and water quality data at Rathbun Reservoir suggest that (1) poor water quality (transparency) in adversely affects the reservoir’s sport fish populations, (2) the aquatic life uses of the Chariton and South Fork arms are impaired due to high levels of turbidity, and (3) improving water transparency through control of nonpoint source runoff (i.e., through implementation of best management practices (BMPs)) could provide significant benefits to the sport fishery of this reservoir. Based on this information, the Class B(WW-1) aquatic life uses of the Chariton Arm are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported.”


Class HH-F - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

Number of Non - Detects

Mean Value > Criterion or MCL

Assessment Type

Support Level

99990024

12

Cadmium

1 / 1

1

1

1

1

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Chromium

1 / 1

2.5

2.5

2.5

1

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Copper

2 / 2

5

5

5

2

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Mercury

2 / 2

4.7

2.4

2.4

1

YES

Evaluated

Not

99990024

12

Nickel

1 / 1

7.5

7.5

7.5

1

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Selenium

1 / 1

0.4

0.4

0.4

1

NO

Evaluated

Full

99990024

12

Zinc

1 / 1

3.5

3.5

3.5

1

NO

Evaluated

Full


Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
4/30/2014
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/17/2018
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
240
Non-fixed station physical/chemical (conventional + toxicants)
270
PWS chemical monitoring (ambient water)
330
Fish surveys