Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Dry Branch IA 01-TRK-2002

confluence with unnamed tributary in the N 1/2 S4 T95N R8W Fayette Co. to headwaters in SW1/4 S33 T97N R8W Winneshiek Co.

Assessment Cycle
2008
Result Period
2004 - 2006
Designations
General Use
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 4d
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-TRK-0419_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on results of an IDNR investigation of a fish kill in May 2004.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the current (2008) Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was classified only for general uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and for Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.   According to the Iowa Water Quality Standards, all perennial rivers and streams and all intermittent streams with perennial pools that are not specifically listed in the Iowa surface water classification are designated as Class A1 and Class B(WW1) waters.   Thus, for the current (2008) assessment, perennial flow is presumed, and the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW1) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses of this stream remain assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to a fish kill in May 2004.   The kill was caused by a fertilizer spill.   The party responsible for the kill was identified, and IDNR has sought restitution for the value of the fish killed and the costs incurred by IDNR during investigation of the kill.   This impairment is appropriate for Category 4d of Iowa’s Integrated Report.  

EXPLANATION:  This kill occurred on or before May 2, 2004.   The cause of the kill was identified as a fertilizer spill.   An estimated 16,341 fish were killed with an estimated value of $1,942.   All fish killed were non-game species including minnows (14,534), suckers (91), stonerollers (222), and darters (1,494).   Approximately 1.25 miles of stream was affected.   The kill occurred in Section 28 of T96N, R8W, Winneshiek County.   According to the IDNR investigation of the kill, the spill sent approximately 1,250 gallons of fertilizer into Dry Branch Creek.   According to the IDNR investigation, a farmer traveling downhill on a gravel road lost control of a trailer with a fertilizer nurse tank; the tank burst as a result of the accident.   A mixture of approximately 1,000 gallons of 32 percent nitrogen fertilizer, and 250 gallons of thiosulfate, a chemical enhancement for fertilizer, spilled into the creek.  

According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, the occurrence of a single pollutant-caused fish kill, or a fish kill of unknown origin, on a waterbody or waterbody reach during the most recent assessment period (2004-2007) indicates a severe stress to the aquatic community and suggests that the aquatic life uses should be assessed as “impaired”.   If a cause of the kill is identified, and the cause is either known, or suspected, to be a “pollutant”, the assessment type is considered “monitored” and the affected waterbody is a candidate for Section 303(d) listing.   If, however, a consent order has been issued to the party responsible for the kill and monetary restitution has been sought for the fish killed, the affected waterbody will be placed in IR Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required).   IDNR feels that (1) TMDLs should not be required for kills caused by a one-time illegal or unauthorized release of manure or other toxic substance where enforcement actions were taken and (2) enforcement action is more appropriate, efficient, and effective for addressing a spill-related impairment than is the TMDL process.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/2/2004 Fishkill
Methods
140 Incidence of spills and/or fish kills
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Spills
  • Moderate