Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

East Fork Des Moines River IA 04-EDM-1882

from County Road B63 (aka 130th) (S23 T94N R29W Kossuth Co) to outfall of the Algona wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)

Assessment Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
9/30/2016 1:25:18 PM
Updated
10/5/2016 3:12:04 PM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2016 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Partially Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
1998
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
Class BWW1
WINOFI
Biological: low aquatic macroinvertebrate IBI
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2010
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class HH
Fully Supported
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" (IR 4a) due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceed state water quality criteria. The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 3b-u) based on results of biological sampling in 2003 and 2011-2013. Fish consumption uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" (IR 2a) based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2002 and 2008. The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results from the IDNR ambient monthly monitoring station from 2012 through 2014 near St. Joseph in Kossuth County (STORET station 10550001), (2) results of IDNR/SHL biological sampling conducted in 2003 and 2011-2013, and (3) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Algona in July 2002 and 2008.

Assessment Explanation

[Note: A TMDL for indicator bacteria (E. coli) was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in January 2009. Thus, the bacteria impairment for this segment is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).]

The Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on results of monitoring for indicator bacteria (E. coli). The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 24 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2008 through 2010 at IDNR station 10550001 near St. Joseph were as follows: the 2012 geometric mean was 64 orgs/100 ml, the 2013 geometric mean was 394 orgs/100 ml, and the 2014 geometric mean was 231 orgs/100 ml. The 2013 and 2014 geometric means slightly exceed the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml; the 2012 geometric mean is well-below the Class A1 criterion. Ten of the 24 samples (42%) exceeded the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean exceeds the respective water quality criterion, the contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as “impaired” (partially supported).

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting” based on data collected in 2003 and 2011-2013 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream ambient biological and REMAP sampling projects. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2003 FIBI score was 48 (fair). The 2011-2013 BMIBI scores were 31, 43, 44 , 54 (all fair) and 57 (good). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of biological data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 1/1 times in 2003 and passed the BMIBI BIC 0/5 times in the last five years. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (977 and 927 mi2) above the sampling sites was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria.  Even though this segment passed the FIBI BIC (1/1) and failed the BMIBI BIC (0/5), it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the sites used for the assessment don’t fall in the calibrated watershed size. According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).

Despite the results of biological monitoring that suggest “partial support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses, the results of IDNR/UHL ambient monitoring from 2012-2014 suggest relatively good water quality and “full support” of the Class B(WW1) uses.  None of the 36 samples collected during the 2012-2014 assessment period at the IDNR/UHL ambient monitoring station (10550001) violated Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for pH, ammonia-nitrogen, temperature, chloride, or sulfate.  One of the 36 samples (3%) had a level of dissolved oxygen (4.4 mg/l) that violated the Class B(WW1) criterion of 5.0 mg/l.  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting (U.S. EPA 1997b:  page 3-17), a violation frequency for conventional parameters such as dissolved oxygen of less than 10% does not suggest an impairment of aquatic life uses.  Thus, the results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring from 2012-2014 suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.  

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Algona in 2002 and 2008. The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and walleye in 2002 had low levels of contaminants. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.069 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of walleye fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.154 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. Follow-up sampling of walleye was conducted in 2008. The level of mercury in the composite sample of walleye fillets in 2008 was 0.14 ppm. The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2008 RAFT sampling conducted at this river show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
1/10/2012 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/2/2014 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/5/2008 Fish Tissue Monitoring
7/29/2002 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/26/2003 Biological Monitoring
9/13/2011 Biological Monitoring
8/2/2012 Biological Monitoring
9/10/2013 Biological Monitoring
Methods
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
260 Fish tissue analysis
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quantitative physical habitat assessment
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring