Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Missouri River IA 06-WEM-1722

from confluence with Omaha Creek Ditch (SW 1/4 S6 T86N R47W Woodbury Co. at river mile 715.8 (near Browns Lake)) to confluence with Big Sioux R. at river mile 734.0 at Sioux City Woodbury Co.

Assessment Cycle
2010
Result Period
2006 - 2008
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 4c
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-WEM-0040_3
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Fully
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on (1) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring near Sergeant Bluff in 2004 and 2007, (2) information from Nebraska fisheries biologists, and (3) assessment information from Nebraska DEQ’s 2008 Integrated Report.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on data and information from the Nebraska DEQ.   The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on information from local fisheries biologists on impacts related to flow modification and habitat alterations in this segment of the Missouri River.   The fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2004 and 2007.   The sources of information for this assessment include (1) results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring near Sergeant Bluff in 2004 and 2007, (2) information from Nebraska fisheries biologists, and (3) assessment information from Nebraska DEQ’s 2008 Integrated Report (http://www.deq.state.ne.us/).   [Note:  Nebraska's 2010 Integrated Report was not yet available during development of this (2010) assessment.]

EXPLANATION:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on the assessment of primary contact recreation uses identified for this segment of the Missouri River by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ) for their 2006 and 2008 Section 303(d) listing cycles.    

The Class B(WW1) uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on the assessment developed for the 1998, 2000, and 2002 reports (i.e., habitat alterations and flow modifications that resulted from development of the river for navigation uses in the mid-Twentieth Century).   This assessment was developed in consultation with the Missouri River fisheries biologist for the state of Nebraska.  

Fish consumption uses were assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Sergeant Bluff in 2004 and 2007.   The composite samples of fillets from common carp, flathead catfish, and freshwater drum had low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets in 2004 were as follows: mercury: 0.101 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.043 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of flathead catfish fillets in 2004 were as follows: mercury: 0.062 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   Follow-up sampling conducted in 2007 showed that levels of primary contaminants in teh composite sample of freshwater drum fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.195 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   The fish contaminant data generated from the 2004 and 2007 RAFT sampling conducted at this river segment show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/21/2007 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/30/2004 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
260 Fish tissue analysis
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
860 Other Agencies/Organizations provided monitoring data
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Flow alteration Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Flow Regulation/Modification
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Channelization
  • Moderate