Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Missouri River IA 06-WEM-1720

from confluence with Little Sioux R. (Harrison Co.) to confluence with Elm Cr. at river mile 691.0 at Decatur NE (=S18 T83N R46W Monona Co.).

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 4c
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-WEM-0040_1
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on information from Nebraska fisheries biologists on habitat conditions in the Missouri River.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) remain “not assessed” (IR 3a) due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 4c) based on information from local fisheries biologists on impacts related to flow modification and habitat alterations in this segment of the Missouri River.   The human health/fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” (IR 3a) due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this river segment.   The source of information for this assessment remains information from Nebraska fisheries biologists on habitat conditions in the Missouri River.  

EXPLANATION:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.  

The Class B(WW1) uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR Category 4c, non-pollutant stressor) based on the assessment developed for previous assessment/listing cycles (i.e., habitat alterations and flow modifications that resulted from development of the river for navigation uses in the mid-Twentieth Century).   This assessment was developed in consultation with the Missouri River fisheries biologist for the state of Nebraska.  

Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of recent fish contaminant monitoring in this river segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Flow alteration Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Flow Regulation/Modification
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Channelization
  • Moderate