Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Desoto Bend IA 06-WEM-1716

Harrison County S21T78NR45W 5 mi. W of Missouri Valley.

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class B(LW) Class A1 Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5a
Trophic
Hypereutrophic
Trend
Improving
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-WEM-00340-L_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2009-2012 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted in 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (4) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 2010.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY: The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to aesthetically objectionable conditions primarily caused by the presence of large amounts of suspended sediment.   The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” although siltation remains a concern.   Fish consumption uses assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish tissue monitoring in 2010.   Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2009-2012 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted in 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (4) results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 2010.

EXPLANATION: For the 2014 reporting cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses for Desoto Bend Lake are assessed as “partially supported” based on results from the ISU statewide survey of lakes and the UHL ambient lake monitoring program.   Using the median values from these surveys from 2008-2012 (approximately 11 samples), Carlson’s (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 65, 60, and 65 respectively for Desoto Bend Lake.   According to Carlson (1977) the index values for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus all place Desoto Bend Lake in between the eutrophic and hypereutrophic categories.   These values suggest relativley low levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, poor water transparency, and moderately high levels of phosphorus in the water column.  

Desoto Bend Lake Lake was listed as "partially supporting" the Class A1 uses for the 2010 and 2012 assessment/listing cycles due to algal turbidity.   Based on IDNR's assessment methodology, median-based TSI values for both chlorophyll a must be 63 or less for two consecutive assessment/listing cycles before a lake can be removed from the state's Section 303(d) list (IR Category 5).   The median TSI values for the 2012 assessment and listing cycle for chlorophyll a was 60.  Because the median TSI value are less than or equal to 63 for a second assessment and listing cycle, the algae impairment at Desoto Bend Lake is suggested for de-listing for the 2014 Integrated Report.    

The levels of inorganic suspended solids at this lake were high and suggest that non-algal turbidity contributes to the impairment at this lake.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Desoto Bend Lake (10.9 mg/L) and ranked 115th of the 134 lakes sampled by the ISU and UHL surveys.  

Data from the ISU and UHL surveys suggest that cyanobacteria populations were moderately large at Desoto Bend Lake and may contribute to impairment at this lake.   These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 68% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake.   The median cyanobacteria wet mass (30.6 mg/L) and ranked 99th of the 134 lakes sampled.  

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses for Desoto Bend Lake are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” Data from the ISU and UHL surveys from 2008-2012 show no violations of the Class B(LW) criterion for ammonia in 11 samples or pH in 11 samples.   There were two violations of the Class B(LW) criterion for dissolved oxygen in 11 samples (18%).   Based on IDNR's assessment methodology these violations are not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore do not suggest an impairment of the Class B(LW) uses.  Information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, however, suggests that turbidity and algae remain concerns and common carp affect the fishery and water quality at this lake.  

Fish consumption uses were assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.   EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring at DeSoto Bend in 2010.   The composite samples of fillets from common carp and largemouth bass had low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.106 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of largemouth bass fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.164 ppm.  The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.    The fish contaminant data generated from the 2010 RAFT sampling conducted at this lake show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/17/2012 Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/2/2010 Fish Tissue Monitoring
5/13/2008 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 2
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 4
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Natural Sources
  • Sediment resuspension
  • Slight
  • Moderate
  • Slight
  • Moderate
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Turbidity Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Sediment resuspension
  • Moderate