Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Missouri River IA 06-WEM-1715

from confluence with Boyer R. (Pottawattamie Co.) to confluence with Little Sioux R. at river mile 669.2 in Harrison Co.

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/31/2019 10:56:23 AM
Updated
7/30/2019 9:36:24 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2016
Impairment Rationale
Listing by adjacent state
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: adjacent state
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 1
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4c - Non-pollutant caused impairment. No TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Hydromodification: Dam Release
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
1992
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Special project/study
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4c - Non-pollutant caused impairment. No TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Hydromodification: Habitat Modification
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
1992
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Special project/study
Class HH
Human Health -
Fully Supported
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed as "partially supported" based on the bacterial impairment of recreation uses identified by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality. The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed as "partially supported" based on information from local fisheries biologists on impacts related to historic flow modification and habitat alterations in this segment of the Missouri River.  The fish consumption uses remain assessed as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2009.  The sources of information for this assessment include (1) results of U.S. EPA/DNR fish tissue monitoring near Little Sioux in 2009 and (2) information from Nebraska fisheries biologists. 

Assessment Explanation

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed as "partially supporting" based on the bacterial impairment identified for this assessment segment by the state of Nebraska. A TMDL for the Nebraska impairment in this segment of the Missouri River was approved by EPA in 2007. Because Iowa DNR did not participate in the preparation of this TMDL, this impairment is appropriate for Category 5a of Iowa's Integrated Report.

The Class B(WW1) uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 4c, non-pollutant stressor) based on the assessment developed for the 1998, 2000, and 2002 reports (i.e., habitat alterations and flow modifications that resulted from development of the river for navigation uses in the mid-Twentieth Century). This assessment was developed in consultation with the Missouri River fisheries biologist for the state of Nebraska.

Fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of U.S. EPA/DNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring in 2009 near Little Sioux in Harrison County. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.062 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. The level of mercury in the composite sample of flathead catfish fillets was 0.156 ppm. The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2009 RAFT sampling conducted at this river segment show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/11/2009
Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
260
Fish tissue analysis
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring