Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Missouri River IA 06-WEM-1708

from confluence with Platte R. (Mills Co.) to the water supply intake at Council Bluffs near River Mile 619 in SE 1/4 S22 T75N R44W Pottawattamie Co.

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
Class A Class B(WW)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-WEM-0020_1
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on (1) surveys of Nebraska fisheries biologists, (2) consultation between Nebraska biologists and IDNR staff, (3) 2006 assessment information from Nebraska DEQ and (4) results of EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring 1999.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” based on the impairment identified by the Nebraska DEQ due to high levels of indicator bacteria.   The Class B(WW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on information from local fisheries biologists on impacts related to flow modification and habitat alterations in this segment of the Missouri River.   The fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 1999.   The sources of information for this assessment include (1) results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring near Council Bluffs in 1999, (2) information from Nebraska fisheries biologists, and (3) 2006 assessment information from Nebraska DEQ.

EXPLANATION:  The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” based on the impairment of primary contact recreation uses identified for this segment of the Missouri River by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality for the 2006 Section 303(d) listing cycle.   The Nebraska DEQ identified an impairment of primary contact recreation uses in this river segment due to high levels of indicator bacteria (fecal coliforms).  

The Class B(WW) uses remain assessed as "partially supported" based on the assessment developed for previous reporting cycles (i.e., habitat alterations and flow modifications that resulted from development of the river for navigation uses in the mid-Twentieth Century).   This assessment was developed in consultation with the Missouri River fisheries biologist for the state of Nebraska.  

Fish consumption uses were assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring south of Council Bluffs in 1999.   The composite samples of fillets from common carp and flathead catfish had low levels of contaminants.   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   Prior to 2006, IDNR used action levels published by the U.S Food and Drug Administration to determine whether consumption advisories should be issued for fish caught as part of recreational fishing in Iowa.   In an effort to make Iowa’s consumption more compatible with the various protocols used by adjacent states, the Iowa Department of Public Health, in cooperation with Iowa DNR, developed a risk-based advisory protocol.   This protocol went into effect in January 2006 (see http://www.iowadnr.gov/fish/news/consump.html for more information on Iowa’s revised fish consumption advisory protocol).   Because the revised (2006) protocol is more restrictive than the previous protocol based on FDA action levels; fish contaminant data that previously suggested “full support” may now suggest either a threat to, or impairment of, fish consumption uses.   This scenario, however, does not apply to the fish contaminant data generated from the 1999 RAFT sampling conducted in this assessment segment:  the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the new (2006) advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/1/1999 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
260 Fish tissue analysis
240 Non-fixed station physical/chemical (conventional + toxicants)
860 Other Agencies/Organizations provided monitoring data
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Flow alteration Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Flow Regulation/Modification
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Channelization
  • Moderate
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate