Arrowhead Pond IA 06-WED-1702
Pottawattamie County S29T77NR41W 1.5 mi SE of Neola
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trophic
- Eutrophic
- Trend
- Stable
- Created
- 5/6/2016 8:58:50 AM
- Updated
- 9/9/2016 10:28:14 AM
The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Arrowhead Pond are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported." The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” (IR 2b) due to a fish kill that occurred in July 2005. Sediment, nutrients, turbidity, and algae are also concerns at this lake. Fish consumption uses are “not assessed” due (IR 3a) to a lack of fish contaminant monitoring at this lake. Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2010 through 2014 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) results of a fish kill investigation in July 2005.
For the 2016 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Arrowhead Pond are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" due to poor water transparency and aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by algae blooms based on information from the ISU lake survey. Using the median values from these surveys from 2010-2014 (approximately 15 samples), Carlson 's (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 65, 67, and 69 respectively for Arrowhead Pond. According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus values all place Arrowhead Pond in the Eutrophic category. These values suggest high levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, poor water transparency, and high levels of phosphorus in the water column. The data show no violations of the Class A1 criterion for pH in 15 samples. The level of inorganic suspended solids was moderately high at Arrowhead Pond, and does suggest that non-algal turbidity may contribute to the impairment at this lake. The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Arrowhead Pond (6 mg/L) was ranked 95th among the 138 lakes by the ISU lake survey. Data from the 2010-2014 ISU lake survey suggest a moderately large population of cyanobacteria exists at Arrowhead Pond. These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 80% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake. The median cyanobacteria wet mass (26.8 mg/L) was ranked 86th of the 138 lakes sampled. The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported", based on information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, due to a fish kill in 2005, impacts of siltation but also to excessive nutrient loading to the water column, and moderately high levels of non-algal turbidity. Results of the ISU lake survey from 2010-2014, however, show there were no violations of the criterion for ammonia in 15 samples(0%), no violations of the criterion for dissolved oxygen in 15 samples(0%), and no violations of the criterion for pH in 15 samples(0%). Based on IDNR's assessment methodology these violations are not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore suggest (fully supported/monitored) of the Class B(LW) uses of Arrowhead Pond. A fish kill that occurred in this lake on July 26, 2005, however suggests "impairment" of the Class B(LW) uses. The kill was identified as a summer kill due to low levels of dissolved oxygen related to an algal die-off. According to the IDNR investigation, approximately 500 bluegill, 1,500 yellow bass, and 600 channel catfish (including all cage catfish at this lake) were killed. The estimated value of the fish killed was $39,000. This is the same assessment as that developed for the 2010, 2012 and 2014 assessment/listing cycles. The continuance of the IR Category 2b listing is based on IDNR's 2012 assessment methodology that states the following: the occurrence of a single pollutant-caused fish kill, or a fish kill of unknown origin, on a waterbody or waterbody reach during the most recent assessment period (2012-2014) indicates a severe stress to the aquatic community and suggests that the aquatic life uses should be assessed as “impaired.” If a cause of the kill was not identified during the IDNR investigation, or if the kill was attributed to non-pollutant causes (e.g., winterkill), the assessment type will be considered “evaluated” and will be placed in IR subcategories 2b or 3b and will be added to the state list of waters in need of further investigation. Thus, this assessment segment will remain in Category 2b of Iowa’s 2016 Integrated Report. Note: A TMDL for siltation at Arrowhead Pond was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in 2001. Not all Section 303(d) impairments identified for the 2016 assessment/listing cycle (algae), however, are addressed in the TMDL. Thus, this waterbody remains in IR Category 5a (impaired; TMDL required) for the 2016 assessment/listing cycle.
Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this lake.