Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Mosquito Creek IA 06-WED-1701

from confluence with Little Mosquito Cr. S29 T75N R43W Pottawattamie Co.) to confluence with Spring Cr. in S9 T78N R41W Harrison Co.

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5b
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-WED-0020_3
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) monitoring in 2000: Fish IBI= 25(fair), 16(poor), 19(poor); BM-IBI=40, 40, 42(fair).

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling at three locations on this stream segment in 2000.   This is the same assessment as that developed for the 2002 reporting cycle.

EXPLANATION:  This assessment was based on data collected in 2000 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.   A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (F-IBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BM-IBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2000 Fish IBI scores were 25 (poor), 16 (poor), 19 (poor) and the BM-IBI scores were 40 (fair), 42 (fair), 42 (fair).  The aquatic life use support was assessed as "not supporting (=NS)," based on a comparison of the F-IBI and BM-IBI scores with biological assessment criteria established specifically for the 2002 Section 305(b) report.  The biological assessment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2001.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
10/12/2000 Biological Monitoring
10/12/2000 One-time Chemical Monitoring
10/11/2000 Biological Monitoring
10/11/2000 One-time Chemical Monitoring
10/9/2000 Biological Monitoring
10/9/2000 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 3
BioIntegrity Poor
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support High
  • Agriculture
  • Channelization
  • Hydromodification
  • Moderate
  • High
  • High
Organic enrichment/Low DO Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Municipal Point Sources
  • Moderate
  • Moderate