Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Little Spirit Lake IA 06-LSR-1659

Dickinson County S8T100NR36W 5 mi. NE of Montgomery.

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class B(LW) Class A1 Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 4a
Trophic
Hypereutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-LSR-02870-L_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2009-2012 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted in 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (4) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 2003.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY: The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to poor water transparency caused by a combination of high levels of chlorophyll-a (suspended algae) and high levels of inorganic suspended solids.   The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” Note: the pH impairment for this lake is suggested for de-listing.  Fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2009-2012 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted in 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (4) results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 2003.  

Note:  A TMDL for turbidity and algae at Little Spirit Lake was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in 2005.   Because all Section 303(d) impairments identified for the 2014 assessment/listing cycle (algal growth, pH, and turbidity) are addressed by the TMDL, this waterbody is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).  

EXPLANATION: For the 2014 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Little Spirit Lake are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” based on information from the ISU lake survey and UHL lake monitoring program.   Using the median values from these surveys from 2008-2012 (approximately 14 samples), Carlson’s (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 66, 65, and 73 respectively for Little Spirit Lake.   According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth and chlorophyll a values place Little Spirit Lake in between the eutrophic and hypereutrophic categories, while the total phosphorus value places Little Spirit Lake in the hypereutrophic category.   These values suggest high levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, poor water transparency, and very high levels of phosphorus in the water column.  

Based on data from the ISU and UHL lake surveys, the level of inorganic suspended solids was monderately high at this lake and suggests that non-algal turbidity contributes to the impairment at this lake.   The median inorganic suspended solids concentration at Little Spirit Lake was 8.1 mg/L, and ranked 100th of the 134 monitored lakes.

Data from the 2008-2012 ISU and UHL surveys suggest a moderately large population of cyanobacteria exists at Little Spirit Lake, which contributes to occasional algal blooms and aesthetically objectionable conditions at this lake.   These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 71% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake.   The median cyanobacteria wet mass (24.7 mg/L) and ranked 84th of the 134 lakes sampled.  

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” Results of the ISU and UHL lake surveys from 2008-2012 show there were no violations of the Class B(LW) criterion for ammonia in 14 samples and no violations of the Class B(LW) for dissoved oxygen in 14 samples.  There were no violations of the Class A1,B(LW) criterion for pH in 14 samples.  However, Little Spirit Lake was assessed as “partially supporting” in the 2010 assessment/listing cycle due to significant violations of the pH criteria.   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology 2 consecutive assessment/listing cycles without significantly greater than 10% of the samples violating the criterion are necessary to propose delisting based on pH violations.   Because violations of the pH criteria were not significantly greater than 10% for the 2012 assessment/listing cycle or the current (2014) assessment/listing cycle the pH impairment for Center Lake is suggested for delisting.

Fish consumption uses were assessed (evaluated) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring at Little Spirit Lake in 2003.   The composite samples of fillets from common carp and walleye had low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.019 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of walleye fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.04 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   The fish contaminant data generated from the 2003 RAFT sampling conducted at this lake show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/14/2012 Fixed Monitoring End Date
5/13/2008 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/3/2003 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Primary Contact Recreation High
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Moderate
Turbidity Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Sediment resuspension
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate