Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Little Spirit Lake IA 06-LSR-1659

Dickinson County S8T100NR36W 5 mi. NE of Montgomery.

Assessment Cycle
2010
Result Period
2006 - 2008
Designations
Class B(LW) Class A1 Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 4a
Trophic
Hypereutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-LSR-02870-L_0
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2004 through 2007 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted from 2005 through 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (4) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 2003.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY: The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to (1) poor water transparency caused by a combination of high levels of chlorophyll-a (suspended algae) and high levels of inorganic suspended solids and (2) high levels of pH that exceed the Class A1 water quality criterion.   The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” primarily due to violations of the Class B(LW) criterion for pH and secondarily due to algal blooms, sediment re-suspension, and nutrient loading to the water column.   Fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2004 through 2007 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted from 2005 through 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (4) results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 2003.  

Note:  A TMDL for turbidity and algae at Little Spirit Lake was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in 2005.   Because all Section 303(d) impairments identified for the 2010 assessment/listing cycle (algal growth, pH, and turbidity) are addressed by the TMDL, this waterbody is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).  

EXPLANATION: For the 2010 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Little Spirit Lake are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” based on information from the ISU lake survey and UHL lake monitoring program.   Using the median values from these surveys from 2004 through 2008 (approximately 25 samples), Carlson’s (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 69, 71, and 78 respectively for Little Spirit Lake.   According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth value places Little Spirit Lake in between the eutrophic and hypereutrophic categories, while the chlorophyll a and total phosphorus values place Little Spirit Lake in the hypereutrophic category.   These values suggest very high levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, poor water transparency, and extremely high levels of phosphorus in the water column.  

Based on data from the ISU and UHL lake surveys, the level of inorganic suspended solids was very high at this lake and suggests that non-algal turbidity contributes to the impairment at this lake.   The median inorganic suspended solids concentration at Little Spirit Lake was 8.4 mg/L, which was the 25th highest of the 132 monitored lakes.

Data from the 2004-2008 ISU and UHL surveys suggest a moderately large population of cyanobacteria exists at Little Spirit Lake, which contributes to occasional algal blooms and aesthetically objectionable conditions at this lake.   These data show that cyanobacteria comprised only 39% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake.   The median cyanobacteria wet mass (12.4 mg/L) was the 55th lowest of the 132 lakes sampled.  

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to violations of the Class B(LW) criterion for pH as well as algal blooms, sediment re-suspension, and nutrient loading to the water column.   Results of the ISU and UHL lake surveys from 2004 through 2008 show there was one violation of the Class B(LW) criterion for ammonia in 24 samples.   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology a single violation of the ammonia criterion does not suggest impairment of the Class B(LW) uses of Little Spirit Lake.   There was one violation of the Class B(LW) criterion for dissolved oxygen in 25 samples (4%).   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology this violation is not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore does not suggest impairment of the Class B(LW) uses at Little Spirit Lake.   There were, however, 8 violations of the Class A1,B(LW) criterion for pH in 25 samples (32%).   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology these violations are significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore suggest impairment (partial support/monitored) of the Class A1 and B(LW) uses of Little Spirit Lake.

Fish consumption uses were assessed (evaluated) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring at Little Spirit Lake in 2003.   The composite samples of fillets from common carp and walleye had low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.019 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of walleye fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.04 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   The fish contaminant data generated from the 2003 RAFT sampling conducted at this lake show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/15/2008 Fixed Monitoring End Date
5/18/2004 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/3/2003 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Natural Sources
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Slight
pH Aquatic Life Support Slight
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Moderate
pH Primary Contact Recreation Slight
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Moderate
Suspended solids Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Sediment resuspension
  • Moderate
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Primary Contact Recreation High
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • High
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Aquatic Life Support Slight
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Moderate
Turbidity Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Sediment resuspension
  • Moderate
Turbidity Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Sediment resuspension
  • Moderate