Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Ocheyedan River IA 06-LSR-1641

from confluence with Little Ocheyedan R. (S28 T98N R39W Osceola Co.) to the Iowa/Minnesota state line

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
Class B(LR)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 1
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-LSR-0260_0
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on results of fish surveys conducted by staff and students at Lakeside Laboratory in June 1998.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of fish surveys conducted in 1998 by staff and students of Lakeside Laboratory.   Due only to a change in IDNR's assessment/listing methodology, the 2004 assessment of the Class B(LW) aquatic life uses ["fully supporting / threatened" (minor impacts)] is changed to "fully supporting".   Other than this change in methodology, this new (2006) assessment is the same as that developed for the previous (2004) assessment/listing cycle (not impaired) and does not reflect any known change in water quality.

EXPLANATION:  The aquatic life uses remain assessed as "fully supported / threatened" based on results of the biological monitoring conducted on this stream segment in 1998 by students from Lakeside Laboratory (see assessment for the 1998 and 2000 reporting cycles for more information).  

At the recommendation of U.S.  EPA Region 7, IDNR's 2006 assessment/listing methodology was changed to eliminate use of the "fully supported/threatened" (not impaired) category.   Thus, previous assessments identified as "fully supported/threatened" (not impaired) were changed to "fully supported" for the 2006 assessment/listing cycle.   This change does not alter the 2004 assessment:  this waterbody remains in IR Category 2a.  

In addition, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).   Also, because these data were collected for purposes other than assessing stream health, the assessment type is considered "evaluated."

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
6/1/1998 Biological Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
375 Visual observation-- may not quantify some parameters-- single season-- by prof.
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 3
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Channelization
  • Not Impairing