Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Virgin Lake IA 06-LSR-1630

Palo Alto County S30T96NR34W 2 mi S of Ruthven.

Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
Trend
Stable
Created
1/4/2022 8:29:42 AM
Updated
2/17/2022 2:49:42 PM
Use Support
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2010 Class BLW Turbidity: Suspended Solids Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
2010 Class BLW Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class BLW use was assessed as "fully supported." All other designated uses were “not assessed.”

Assessment Explanation

  • Data Sources:

    Data Source

    Data Source ID

    Data Type

    Data Age

    Site ID

    Site Name

    Site Description

    Iowa DNR

    6

    WQ

    CY 2016-2020

    22740004

    Virgin Lake

    Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data

    Class A1 - pH

    Site ID

    Data Source ID

    # Samples / # Years

    Minimum Value

    Maximum Value

    Mean Value

    # Violations

    Violations needed for impairment

    Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

    Assessment Type

    Support Level

    22740004

    6

    23 / 5

    7.35

    9.38

    8.24

    2

    5

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    Class A1 - Lake TSI's

    Site ID

    Data Source ID

    Parameter Name

    # Samples / # Years

    Minimum Value

    Maximum Value

    Median Value

    Median TSI Violation?

    Assessment Type

    Support Level

    22740004

    6

    Chlorophyll a TSI

    23 / 5

    24

    102

    56

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    22740004

    6

    Total Phosphorus TSI

    23 / 5

    71

    127

    85

    NA

    NA

    NA

    22740004

    6

    Inorganic suspended solids

    13 / 3

    0

    4235

    3

    NA

    NA

    NA

    • The TSI value for Secchi depth is not used to evaluate the attainment of aquatic life use in shallow lakes. Due to the depth of these shallow lakes, TSI values for Secchi depth can be misleading. In some instances, the Secchi disk remains visible at the bottom of the lake and the depth of the lake is recorded as the Secchi depth. In these instances, water clarity may be sufficient to support the Class B(LW) uses, but the index value is limited by the depth of the lake. Thus the combination of total suspended solids and chlorophyll a will be used to determine whether or not the Class B(LW) uses are impaired in these shallow systems.
    • DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment. The chlorophyll a TSI value for the 2010 assessment listing cycle was 83, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions. Because the TSI value for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65 (2020 listing for chlorophyll a was 56), and because the TSI value for the current listing cycle is also 56, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for chlorophyll a is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

    Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

    Site ID

    Data Source ID

    Parameter Name

    # Samples / # Years

    Minimum Value

    Maximum Value

    Mean Value

    # Violations

    # Acute / Chronic Violations

    Violations needed for impairment

    Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

    Assessment Type

    Support Level

    22740004

    6

    Ammonia

    18 / 4

    0.0036

    0.6827

    0.12

    NA

    0 / 1

    4

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    22740004

    6

    Dissolved Oxygen

    23 / 5

    0.81

    10.82

    7.7

    2

    NA / NA

    5

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    22740004

    6

    pH

    23 / 5

    7.35

    9.38

    8.24

    2

    NA / NA

    5

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    22740004

    6

    Temperature

    23 / 5

    9.2

    27.9

    21.6

    0

    NA / NA

    5

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    Class BLW - Protection of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation:

    Site ID

    Data Source ID

    Parameter Name

    # Samples / # Years

    Minimum Value

    Maximum Value

    Median Value

    Median Value = SAV

    Assessment Type

    Support Level

    22740004

    6

    Total suspended solids

    23 / 5

    0

    6190

    8

    NO

    Monitored

    Full

    • Guidelines for wetland assessment from the Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee’s Water Quality Technical Section (2003) state that an average total suspended solids concentration during the growing season of less than 30 mg/L is necessary to provide sufficient water clarity to support the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation in wetlands and shallow lakes. High levels of total suspended solids impede the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV). Submersed aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of wetland and shallow lake ecosystems. The elimination of SAV can degrade habitat quality such that undesirable aquatic species such as cyanobacteria, common carp and fathead minnows dominate. As such, the suppression of SAV constitutes a violation of Iowa’s narrative water quality criteria protecting against undesirable or nuisance aquatic life.
    • DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a median growing season total suspended solids concentration of 30 mg/L to suggest de-listing of the SAV impairment. The total suspended solids concentration for the 2010 assessment listing cycle was 54, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment. Because the total suspended solids concentration for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 30 (2020 listing for SAV was 10), and because the total suspended solids concentration for the current listing cycle is also 8, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for SAV is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

    Class HH: No Data

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/18/2016
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/15/2020
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)