Maple River IA 06-LSR-1582

Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on 1997 IDNR/UHL biological monitoring data: FIBI = 38 (fair), BMIBI = 68 (good). FIBI BIC = 31, BMIBI BIC = 54.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), and due to the completion of a Use Attainability Analysis, this segment is also now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses).]

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The Class B(WW-1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 1997.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.   The 1997 sampling data are now greater than five years old; therefore, this assessment is now considered "evaluated" instead of "monitored".

EXPLANATION:  The assessment was based on data collected in 1997 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.  The 1997 FIBI score was 38 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 68 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 31 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 54.

This aquatic life assessment is considered "evaluated" because there were not two or more samples collected from this segment in multiple years from 2004-2008.   Additionally, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).   Despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 2a.

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this river segment.