Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Maple River IA 06-LSR-1582

from confluence with unnamed tributary approximately 1 mile east of Danbury (SW 1/4 NE 1/4 S26 T86N R42W Woodbury Co.) to confluence with Odebolt Cr. at Ida Grove in NE 1/4 S15 T87N R40W Ida Co.

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-LSR-0070_2
Overall Use Support
Threatened
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) monitoring in 1997: (Fish IBI= 39(fair), BM-IBI= 70(good)).

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  For the 2002 report, the previous waterbody segment for the Maple River (IA 06-LSR-0070-0), which extended 45 miles from its mouth confluence with the Odebolt Creek at Ida Grove (Ida Co.), was split into two subsegments:  (1) mouth (Monona Co.) to confluence with an unnamed tributary 1 mile east of Danbury in Woodbury Co.  (IA 06-LSR-0070-1) and (2) unnamed tributary near Danbury to confluence with Odebolt Creek at Ida Grove (Ida Co.) (IA 06-LSR-0070-2 - this one).   See previous Section 305(b) assessments for subsegment IA 06-LSR-0070_1 for assessments for the original 45-mile river reach.]

SUMMARY:  The Class B(WW) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported / threatened" (minor impacts) based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 1997.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.   This is the same assessment as that developed for the 2002 reporting cycle.

EXPLANATION:  This assessment remains based on results from the August 1997 DNR/UHL biocriteria sampling near Ida Grove.   Based on a comparison to results of ecoregion reference site sampling, the fish community was rated "fair" (Fish IBI=39), and the benthic macroinvertebrate community was rated "good" (BM IBI=70).   These results suggest that the aquatic life uses are "fully supported / threatened."  See the assessment developed for the 2000 reporting cyle for more information.

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this river segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/21/1997 Biological Monitoring
8/21/1997 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Removal of Riparian Vegetation
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing