Assessment Comments
Evaluated assessment based on (1) 2006 IDNR/UHL stream REMAP data: FIBI = 14 (poor), BMIBI = 48 (fair). FIBI BIC = 43; BMIBI BIC = 54 and (2) results of IDNR/UHL ambient water quality monitoring near Turin in 2000-2001.
Basis for Assessment
[Note: Prior to the current (2008) Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is also now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses).]
SUMMARY: The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” based on results of biological monitoring in 2006. Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring conducted in 2006 as part of the stream REMAP project and (2) results of IDNR/UHL ambient water quality monitoring conducted during the 2000-2001 biennial period south of Turin in Monona Co. at STORET station 10670001 (formerly station 911090). Note: The IDNR/UHL ambient monitoring station south of Turin was dropped from the IDNR monitoring network after September 2000.
The evaluated biological assessment of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2006 as part of the DNR/UHL stream REMAP project. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2006 FIBI score was 14 (poor) and the BMIBI score was 48 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 43 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 54. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage area (910 mi2) above this sampling site was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site passed both the BMIBI BIC (using the UAV of 8 points) and failed to meet the FIBI BIC, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.
In contrast to results of biological monitoring in 2006, results of historical water quality monitoring suggest "full support" of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. Monitoring at the IDNR station near Turin showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria in the 12 samples collected during the 2000-2001 biennial period for dissolved oxygen (minimum value = 7.3 mg/l), pH (range = 8.1 to 8.4 units), or ammonia-nitrogen (maximum value = 0.20). Levels of toxic metals in the four samples analyzed, and levels of pesticides in the two samples analyzed, were all below the analytical level of detection. Although these results suggest "full support" of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses, the extensive habitat alterations in this stream system suggest at least a threat to full support of the aquatic life uses.
Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of recent fish contaminant monitoring in this river segment.
