The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 24 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2014 through 2016 at the Little Sioux River near Larrabee (STORET station 10180001) were as follows: the 2014 geometric mean was 143 orgs/100 ml, the 2015 geometric mean was 175 orgs/100 ml, and the 2016 geometric mean was 803 orgs/100 ml. All three recreation season geometric means exceeded the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Eleven of the combined 24 samples (46%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as "partially supported."

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring at the Little Sioux River near Larrabee (STORET station 10180001) suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 36 Ammonia samples (maximum = 1.3 mg/L), 36 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 7.4 mg/L), 36 Temperature samples (maximum = 24.5° c), 36 Chloride samples (maximum = 46 mg/L), or 36 Sulfate samples (maximum = 110 mg/L) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to December 2016. One of the 36 samples (3%) analyzed for pH (range = 7.3 to 9.8) violated the Class B(WW1) criteria during the 2014-2016 monitoring period. According to U.S. EPA guidelines (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17) and Iowa DNR's assessment/listing methodology, a violation frequency of significantly greater than 10% for conventional parameters such as pH suggests impairment of aquatic life uses. Because the frequency of violations for this parameter is not greater than 10 percent, these results do not suggest impairment of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.

Supporting the chemical/physical water quality results and assessment, the results of the 2005 and 2012-2014 biological sampling also indicate "full support" (evaluated) of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 2005 and 2012-2014 as part of the DNR/SHL REMAP and large river projects. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2005 FIBI score was 51 (good) and the 2005 BMIBI score was 56 (good). The 2012 BMIBI score was 52 (fair). The 2013 BMIBI scores were 55 (fair) and 60 (good). The 2014 BMIBI score was 48 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 43 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 54. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (1833 and 1848 mi2) above the sampling sites were greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site passed both the FIBI (1/1) and BMIBI BICs (3/5), it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the sites used for the assessment don’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.