Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Lake Pahoja IA 06-BSR-1532

Lyon County S23T99NR48W 5 mi SSW of Larchwood.

Assessment Cycle
2002
Result Period
1998 - 2000
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 0
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Improving
Legacy ADBCode
IA 06-BSR-00280-L_0
Overall Use Support
Threatened
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Threatened
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of (1) ISU lake survey in 2000-01, (2) surveys by IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) ISU report on lake plankton communities. See attached document for details.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting / threatened."  The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting / threatened."  Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed."  The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) information on phytoplankton communities at Iowa lakes in 2000 from Downing et al.  (2002).   Further monitoring and investigation are needed to better characterize water quality conditions at this lake.   EXPLANATION:  Results from the ISU statewide survey of Iowa lakes suggest that high levels of algal turbidity may adversely affect the Class A and Class B(LW) uses of Lake Pahoja.   Using the median values from this survey in 2000 and 2001 (approximately six samples), Carlson's (1977) trophic state indices for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and secchi depth are 76, 64, and 58, respectively.   According to Carlson (1977), the index value for total phosphorus places this lake in the range of hyper-eutrophic lakes, the index value for chlorophyll-a is in the middle range between eutrophic and hyper-eutrophic lakes, and the index value for secchi depth is in the upper range of eutrophic lakes.   These index values suggest excessive levels of phosphorus in the water column, moderately low (and less than expected) levels of chlorophyll-a, and good water transparency.   According to Carlson (1991), the occurrence of a high TSI value for total phosphorus with relatively low values for chlorophyll-a and secchi depth indicate that some factor (e.g., nitrogen limitation or zooplankton grazing) other than phosphorus limits production of algae.   Based on median values from ISU sampling in 2000 and 2001, the ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus for Lake Pahoja is 29; this TN:TP ratio does not suggest strong nitrogen limitation to algal production.   Data from Downing et al.  (2002), however, do show relatively large populations of zooplankton species at this lake that graze on algae.   Sampling in 2000 showed that Cladoceran taxa (e.g., Daphnia) comprised greater than 70% of the dry mass of the zooplankton community in the mid-July and early August samples.   Levels of inorganic suspended solids at this lake are moderately low and do not likely contribute to impairments of designated uses for either primary contact recreation or aquatic life.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids in the 130 lakes sampled for the ISU lake survey in 2000 and 2001 was 5.27 mg/l; the median level for Lake Pahoja was 5.4 mg/l.   Despite the indications of relatively good water quality, the moderately high TSI value for chlorophyll-a suggests threats to the full support of the Class A (primary contact) uses through presence of aesthetically objectionable blooms of algae and due to presence of nuisance algal species (i.e., bluegreen algae).   Data from Downing et al.  (2002) suggest that bluegreen algae (Cyanophyta) dominate the summertime phytoplankton community of this lake.   Sampling in 2000 showed that greater than 95% of the wet mass of the phytoplankton community in the three summer samples was bluegreen algae.   The eutrophic conditions at this lake, along with information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, suggest that the Class B(LW) aquatic life uses should remain assessed as "fully supported / threatened" due to excessive nutrient loading to the water column and siltation in the lake.   Although results of ISU lake monitoring in 2000 and 2001 suggest threats to full support of the designated beneficial uses of this lake, the amount of data available for characterizing water quality is not sufficient for developing an accurate assessment of support of these uses.   Additional data for this lake are being generated as part of the ongoing ISU lake survey; these data will be used to improve the accuracy of future water quality assessments.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of recent fish tissue monitoring at this lake.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/17/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
6/13/2000 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Not Impairing
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Primary Contact Recreation Not Impairing
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Not Impairing
Noxious aquatic plants Primary Contact Recreation Not Impairing
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Not Impairing
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Nutrients Primary Contact Recreation Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing