Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Yellow Smoke Park Lake IA 06-BOY-1514

Crawford County S6T83NR38W 2 mi NE of Denison.

Cycle
2020
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
Trophic
Mesotrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
8/27/2020 9:46:48 AM
Updated
10/15/2020 7:56:29 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Fully Supported
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health -
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2020
Impairment Rationale
Potential fish consumption advisory; additional sampling needed
Data Source
Fish contaminant monitoring: Iowa DNR
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” The Class BLW uses are also assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” The Class HH uses are assessed as "partially supporting" due to the potential of a fish consumption advisory. Note: A TMDL for siltation at Yellow Smoke Lake was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in 2002.

Assessment Explanation

Sources of Data:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2014-2018

22240002

Yellow Smoke Lake

Lake Deep Point

Iowa DNR

FT

See Below

162

Yellow Smoke Lake


Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data


Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

22240002

6

15 / 5

8.7

8.3

8.2

0

0%

NO

Monitored

Full


Class A1 - Lake TSI's

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

22240002

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

15 / 5

31

65

50

NO

Monitored

Full

22240002

6

Secchi TSI

15 / 5

32

70

42

NO

Monitored

Full

22240002

6

Total Phosphorus TSI

15 / 5

33

73

53

NA

NA

NA

22240002

6

Inorganic suspended solids

15 / 5

0.3

7.4

1.1

NA

NA

NA


Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

22240002

6

Ammonia

15 / 5

0.162

0.07

0.07

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Monitored

Full

22240002

6

Dissolved oxygen

15 / 5

12.3

9.2

9.4

NA / 0

NA / 0%

NO

Monitored

Full

22240002

6

pH

15 / 5

8.7

8.3

8.2

0 / NA

0% / NA

NO

Monitored

Full

22240002

6

Temperature

15 / 5

28.4

23

24.8

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples

Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Median Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass = 75th Percentile

Assessment Type

Support Level

22240002

6

10

15.270

46.1 %

0.142

14.3 %

NO

Evaluated

NA


Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling:

Site ID

Date

Species Name

Biopart

# in sample

chlordane result

chlordane violation?

PCBs result

PCBs violation?

Hg result

Hg violation?

Assessment Type

Support Level

162

7/18/17

largemouth bass

plug

3

0.303

Yes

Monitored

Partial

162

8/4/14

largemouth bass

plug

5

0.194

No

Monitored

Full

162

9/24/12

largemouth bass

plug

5

0.218

No

Evaluated

Full

Results from the 2017 sampling show that the level of mercury in the sample exceeds the 1 meal/week trigger level (0.30 ppm) as defined in Iowa’s revised (2007) fish consumption advisory protocol. According to DNR’s assessment methodology, the single occurrence of a contaminant above an advisory trigger level neither warrants issuance of an advisory nor indicates impairment of the fish consumption uses: two consecutive samplings that show contaminant levels are above the trigger level in samples are needed to justify the issuance of an advisory. Thus, follow-up monitoring is needed.



Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/20/2014
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
8/13/2018
Fixed Monitoring End Date
7/18/2017
Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/24/2012
Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/4/2014
Fish Tissue Monitoring
1/28/2002
TMDL Completed
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
260
Fish tissue analysis
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)