Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Manteno Park Pond IA 06-BOY-1505

Shelby County S2T81NR40W 8 mi NW of Defiance.

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Declining
Created
4/10/2019 1:27:30 PM
Updated
4/10/2019 1:43:52 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2018
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
TMDL Priority
Tier I
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by algae blooms. The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to a lack of information on which to base an assessment. Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2012 through 2016 by Iowa State University (ISU), and (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.

Assessment Explanation

For the 2018 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Manteno Lake are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" due to aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by algae blooms based on information from the ISU lake survey. Using the median values from these surveys from 2012-2016 (approximately 15 samples), Carlson 's (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 60, 65, and 68 respectively for Manteno Lake. According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus values all place Manteno Lake in the Eutrophic category. These values suggest high levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, moderately poor water transparency, and high levels of phosphorus in the water column. The data show no violations of the Class A1 criterion for pH in 15 samples.

The level of inorganic suspended solids was moderately high at Manteno Lake, and does suggest that non-algal turbidity may contribute to the impairment at this lake. The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Manteno Lake (3 mg/L) was ranked 67th among the 138 lakes by the ISU lake survey.

Data from the 2012-2016 ISU lake survey suggest a small population of cyanobacteria exists at Manteno Lake. These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 4% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake. The median cyanobacteria wet mass (1.3 mg/L) was ranked 11th of the 138 lakes sampled.

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (Monitored) as “Fully supported” based on information from the DNR Fisheries Bureau and results from the ISU lake surveys. Information from the DNR Fisheries Bureau suggests that Manteno Lake has rooted aquatic vegetation that provides good fish habitat and ties up nutrients that otherwise would be available for algae growth. Sediment ponds above this pond have been built providing some protection. Best management practices in the watershed to reduce sediment and nutrient from reaching the pond are very important to maintaining the water quality and the sport fishery in Manteno Park Pond.Results of the ISU lake survey from 2012-2016 show there were no violations of the criterion for ammonia in 15 samples(0%), 2 violations of the criterion for dissolved oxygen in 15 samples(13%), and no violations of the criterion for pH in 15 samples(0%). Based on DNR's assessment methodology these violations are not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore suggest (fully supported/monitored) of the Class B(LW) uses of Manteno Lake.

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this lake.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/14/2012
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
8/16/2016
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)