Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR

ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

West Nishnabotna River IA 05-NSH-1445

from confluence with West Fork West Nishnabotna R. (NW 1/4 S18 T79N R39W Shelby Co) to confluence with Elk Cr. in S36 T81N R38W Shelby Co.

Assessment Cycle
2008
Result Period
2004 - 2006
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-2)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 05-NSH-0090_2
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 1994: FIBI = 28 (fair), BMIBI = 59 (good). FIBI BIC = 31, BMIBI BIC = 54.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the current (2008) Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses).   Thus, for the current (2008) assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of biological monitoring and habitat assessment conducted as part of IDNR/UHL biocriteria monitoring in 1994.   Due to the age of these data, the assessment category is changed from "monitored" (higher-confidence assessment) to "evaluated" (lower confidence assessment).  

EXPLANATION:  The assessment was based on data collected in 1994 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.   The 1994 FIBI score was 28 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 59 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as Fully Supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 31 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 54.   This site passed the FIBI BIC using the FIBI UAV of 7 points.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/9/1994 Biological Monitoring
8/9/1994 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 3
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Fair