Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

West Nishnabotna River IA 05-NSH-1444

from confluence with East Branch West Nishnabotna R. (S29 T77N R39W Pottawattamie Co.) to confluence with West Fork West Nishnabotna R. in NW 1/4 S18 T79N R39W Shelby Co.

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
Trend
Unknown
Created
7/30/2019 1:02:56 PM
Updated
7/30/2019 1:04:13 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 1
Not Assessed
Class HH
Human Health -
Fully Supported
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses both remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The fish consumption uses remain assessed as "fully supported" based on results of U.S. EPA/DNR fish tissue monitoring near Harlan in August 2011.

Assessment Explanation

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/DNR fish contaminant monitoring near Harlan in 2011. The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish had low levels of contaminants. The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish had very low levels of contaminants. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.028 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2011 RAFT sampling conducted in this segment of the West Nishnabotna River indicate that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of Iowa’s advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/17/2011
Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
260
Fish tissue analysis