Pilot Branch IA 05-NSH-1424
mouth (NW 1/4 S26 T73N R38W Montgomery Co.) to headwaters
- Cycle
- 2018
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 5/2/2019 12:57:41 PM
- Updated
- 7/30/2019 1:24:43 PM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed as "fully supported" based on results of DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2009 and 2013.
The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on data collected in 2009 and 2013 as part of the DNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2009 FIBI score was 51 (good) and the BMIBI score was 63 (good). The 2013 FIBI score was 65 (good) and the BMIBI score was 55 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 31 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 54. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 2/2 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/2 times in the last eight years. Even though this site passed both the FIBI and BMIBI BICs, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small headwater stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size. The assessment type is considered "evaluated" (relatively lower confidence assessment) due to the uncertainty of using biological assessment methods developed for larger wadeable streams for assessing aquatic life conditions in small headwater stream segments.