Assessment Comments
Assessment is based on results of (1) ISU lake survey in 2000-01, (2) surveys by IDNR Fisheries Bureau, (3) ISU report on lake plankton communities, and (4) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring in 1994.
Basis for Assessment
SUMMARY: The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting." The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting / threatened." Fish consumption uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported." The sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted in 2000 and 2001 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (3) information on phytoplankton communities at Iowa lakes in 2000 from Downing et al. (2002), and (4) results of U.S. EPA / IDNR fish contaminant monitoring in 1994. EXPLANATION: Results from the ISU statewide survey of Iowa lakes suggest that the Class A uses of Mormon Trail Lake are "fully supported." Using the median values from this survey in 2000 and 2001 (approximately six samples), Carlson's (1977) trophic state indices for total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, and secchi depth are 62, 47, and 51, respectively. According to Carlson (1977), the index value for total phosphorus places this lake in the lower range between eutrophic and hyper-eutrophic lakes; the index value for chlorophyll-a is in the upper range of mesotrophic lakes, and the index value for secchi depth is in the lower range of eutrophic lakes. These index values suggest that, despite the moderately high levels of phosphorus, the production of suspended algae is extremely low and water transparency is very good for Iowa lakes. These results suggest that this lake does not have impairments due to aesthetically objectionable blooms of algae. According to Carlson (1991), the occurrence of a high TSI value for total phosphorus with relatively low values for chlorophyll-a and secchi depth indicate that some factor (e.g., nitrogen limitation or zooplankton grazing) limits production of algae. Based on median values from ISU sampling in 2000 and 2001, the ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus for Mormon Trail Lake is 17.1. This ratio suggest that algal production at this lake may be limited by the availability of nitrogen. The levels of inorganic suspended solids at this lake are relatively low and do not suggest the potential for impairing designated uses. The median level of inorganic suspended solids in the 130 lakes sampled for the ISU lake survey in 2000 and 2001 was 5.27 mg/l; the median level at Mormon Trail Lake was 3.8 mg/l. This lake does not appear to have problems due to presence of nuisance algal species (i.e., bluegreen algae). Data from Downing et al. (2002) suggest that bluegreen algae (Cyanophyta) comprise a relatively small portion of the phytoplankton community in early and mid-summer but tend to dominate in late summer. Sampling in 2000 showed that bluegreen algae comprised less than 10% of the wet mass of the phytoplankton community in the mid-June and mid-July samples but increased to approximately 75% in the early August sample. Although bluegreen algae comprise a significant portion of the summertime phytoplankton community, the production of chlorophyll is extremely low at this lake, and the presence of bluegreen algae likely does not present a water quality impact. Although results of ISU lake monitoring in 2000 and 2001 suggest threats to full support of the designated beneficial uses of this lake, the amount of data available for characterizing water quality is not sufficient for developing an accurate assessment of support of these uses. Additional data for this lake are being generated as part of the ongoing ISU lake survey; these data will be used to improve the accuracy of future water quality assessments.
Information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau suggests that the Class B(LW) aquatic life uses should be assessed as "fully supported / threatened" due to siltation impacts in the lake. Fish consumption uses remain assessed as "fully supported" based on results of the U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring in 1994. However, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is changed from "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively high confidence) to "evaluated" (indicating an assessment with relatively low confidence).