Middle Fork Little Maquoketa River IA 01-TRK-138
Alternate name(s) for this segment: Bankston Creek
from west line of S31 T90N R1E (Dubuque Co.) to north line of S33 T90N R1W Dubuque Co.
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 8/23/2016 1:15:18 PM
- Updated
- 1/31/2017 9:05:58 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" (IR Category 3a) due to the lack of data for indicator bacteria upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR Category 5b-t) based on based on results of IDNR/SHL cold water stream biological sampling and continuous DO/temperature monitoring in 2012. Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" (IR Category 3a).
The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2012 as part of the IDNR/SHL cold water stream sampling project. A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI). The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2012 CBI scores were 35 and 42. The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the CBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011. The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 0/2 times in 2012. Results of continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature monitoring in 2012 for the IDNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project suggest impairment of Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses. The lowest DO concentration recorded in 55 days of continuous monitoring was 5.7 mg/L. The daily DO minimum concentration failed to meet the 24-hour DO criterion (5 mg/L) in 0 of 55 days. The percentage exceeding (0%) was less than (passing) the 10% impairment threshold used to assess conventional water quality parameters. The associated statistical analysis confidence level was high (>90%). In contrast, the 16-hour DO criterion (7 mg/L) was exceeded in 10 of 55 days. The percentage exceeding (18%) was greater than (failing) the 10% threshold with high statistical confidence (>90%). The maximum stream temperature recorded during the sensor deployment period was 22.8 degrees (C). The B(CW1) temperature criterion of 20 (C) was exceeded in 22 of 55 days. The percentage exceeding (40%) was greater than (failing) the 10% impairment threshold with high statistical confidence (>90%). Based on these data, the B(CW1) aquatic life use is assessed as impaired due to DO and temperature. The assessment type is “evaluated” because it is based on data collected from a single year within the current data assessment period. In order to meet the requirements for a “monitored” assessment, the IDNR’s continuous monitoring assessment methodology requires monitoring data from two or more years within the assessment period. Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to lack of fish tissue monitoring in this stream reach.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years in a five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had a multiple samples collected in 2012. According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation). However, despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 5b-t and remains on Iowa’s 2014 Section 303(d) list of impaired waters.