Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Thayer Lake IA 05-GRA-1369

Union County S22T72NR28W 1 mi SW of Thayer.

Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Improving
Created
6/14/2016 8:41:56 AM
Updated
12/20/2016 1:22:00 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5* - 303(d)-impaired last cycle; fully supporting this cycle; potential de-listing.
Cause Magnitude
High
Status
Continuing
Source
Other: Sediment Resuspension
Source Confidence
High
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
TMDL Priority
Tier I
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
High
Status
Continuing
Source
Other: Sediment Resuspension
Source Confidence
High
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR Fisheries
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2008 Class A1 Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” (IR 5a) due to very poor water transparency related mainly to high levels of inorganic turbidity. The violation of the class A1 due to chlorophyll a TSI values is suggested for removal this assessment cycle. The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” (IR 3b) due to siltation, excessive nutrient loading to the water column, and high levels of non-algal turbidity. Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring at this lake. Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2010 through 2014 by Iowa State University (ISU), and (2) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.

Assessment Explanation

For the 2016 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Thayer Lake are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” (IR 5a) due to very poor water transparency related mainly to high levels of inorganic turbidity based on information from the ISU lake survey. Using the median values from these surveys from 2010-2014 (approximately 15 samples), Carlson 's (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 59, 54, and 64 respectively for Thayer Lake. According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus values all place Thayer Lake in the Eutrophic category. These values suggest low levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, relatively good water transparency, and moderately high levels of phosphorus in the water column. The data show one violation of the Class A1 criterion for pH in 15 samples.

IDNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment.   The chlorophyll a TSI value in Thayer Lake for the 2008 assessment listing cycle was 67, which based on IDNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions.   The TSI value for the 2014 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65 (2014 listing for chlorophyll a was 62), and the TSI value for the current listing cycle is also 63. Based on IDNR's methodology, the impairment (5a) for chlorophyll a is suggested for delisting for the 2016 assessment/listing cycle.

While the TSI value for Secchi depth in Thayer Lake is below the impairment trigger of 65 for the 2016 reporting cycle, Thayer Lake was listed as "not supported" the Class A1 uses for the 2014 reporting cycle due to aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by poor water clarity.   Based on IDNR's assessment methodology, median-based TSI values for Secchi depth must be 63 or less for two consecutive assessment/listing cycles before a lake can be removed from the state’s Section 303(d) list (IR Category 5).    Therefore, Thayer Lake remains assessed as "not supported" due to poor water clarity for the 2016 assessment cycle.

The level of inorganic suspended solids was moderately high at Thayer Lake, and does suggest that non-algal turbidity may contribute to the impairment at this lake. The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Thayer Lake (3 mg/L) was ranked 71st among the 138 lakes by the ISU lake survey.

Data from the 2010-2014 ISU lake survey suggest a small population of cyanobacteria exists at Thayer Lake. These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 58% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake. The median cyanobacteria wet mass (5.6 mg/L) was ranked 15th of the 138 lakes sampled.

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” due to siltation, excessive nutrient loading to the water column. Information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau suggests that water quality has improved after a fishery renovation. No common carp have been sampled in the lake and small areas of rooted aquatic vegetation have appeared.   Algae blooms, however, remain a concern at this lake. Results of the ISU lake survey from 2010-2014 show there were no violations of the criterion for ammonia in 15 samples(0%), 3 violations of the criterion for dissolved oxygen in 15 samples(20%), and one violation of the criterion for pH in 15 samples(7%). Based on IDNR's assessment methodology these violations are not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore suggest (fully supported/monitored) of the Class B(LW) uses of Thayer Lake.

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this lake.

Note:This lake was renovated in 2006.  

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
6/14/2010
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/14/2014
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)