Long Creek IA 05-GRA-1364
mouth (S8 T69N R28W Decatur Co.) to confluence with East Long Cr. in S36 T71N R27W Clarke Co.
Assessment Comments
Assessment is based on 1995 and 2001 IDNR/UHL biological biological monitoring data: FIBI = 62 (good), 38 (fair), BMIBI = 62 (good), 51 (fair). FIBI BIC = 33; BMIBI BIC = 41.
Basis for Assessment
[Note: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses). Thus, for the current (2010) assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]
SUMMARY: The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 1995 and 2001. The 1995 and 2001 sampling data are now greater than five years old; therefore, this assessment is now considered "evaluated" instead of "monitored".
EXPLANATION: The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting" based on biological data collected in 1995 and 2001 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream biocriteria project. The 1995 FIBI score was 62 (good) and the BMIBI score was 62 (good). The 2001 FIBI score was 38 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 51 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supported (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 33 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 41. This segment passed the FIBI and BMIBI BICs 2/2 times in the lsat 14 years.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years between 2004 and 2008 to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 14 years (1995-2008); however, the multiple samples were not collected during 2004-2008. Additionally, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence). Despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 2a.
Assessment Key Dates
| 10/11/2001 | Biological Monitoring |
| 10/11/2001 | One-time Chemical Monitoring |
| 9/14/1995 | Biological Monitoring |
Methods
| 330 | Fish surveys |
| 380 | Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof |
| 220 | Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only) |
| 315 | Regional reference site approach |
| 320 | Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| 150 | Monitoring data more than 5 years old |
Monitoring Levels
| Biological | 4 |
| Habitat | 4 |
| Physical Chemistry | 1 |
| Toxic | 0 |
| Pathogen Indicators | 0 |
| Other Health Indicators | 0 |
| Other Aquatic Life Indicators | 0 |
| # of Bio Sites | 1 |
| BioIntegrity | Fair |