Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Nine Eagles Lake IA 05-GRA-1361

Decatur County S18T67NR25W 3.5 mi. SE of Davis City.

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class B(LW) Class C Class A1 Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5a
Trophic
Mesotrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 05-GRA-01010-L_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Partial
Primary Contact Recreation
Partial
Drinking Water
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results of the IDNR-UHL beach monitoring program from 2010-2012, (2) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2009-2012 by Iowa State University (ISU), (3) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted in 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (4) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (5) results from the EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring program in 2001, 2005, 2007, and 2009.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” (IR 5a) due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceed state water quality standards.   The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” (IR 2a).   Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” (IR 5a) due to the existence of a fish consumption advisory.   The Class C (drinking water) uses remain “not assessed” (IR 3a) due to a lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the IDNR-UHL beach monitoring program from 2010-2012, (2) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2009-2012 by Iowa State University (ISU), (3) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted in 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), (4) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (5) results from the EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring program in 2001, 2005, 2007, and 2009.

Note:  A TMDL for turbidity at Nine Eagles Lake was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in 2001.   Through implementation of this TMDL, water clarity at this lake had improved such that the lake was de-listed for the 2004 assessment/listing cycle.    Because, however, the 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014 Section 303(d) impairments due to indicator bacteria and mercury in fish tissue at Nine Eagles Lake were not addressed in the TMDL, this waterbody remains in Category 5a (impaired; TMDL required) for the 2012 cycle.

EXPLANATION: Results of IDNR beach monitoring from 2010-2012 suggest that the Class A1 uses are “partially supported."  Levels of indicator bacteria at Nine Eagles Lake beach were monitored once per week during the primary contact recreation seasons (May through September) of 2010 (17 samples), 2010 (15 samples), and 2012 (15 samples) as part of the IDNR beach monitoring program.   According to IDNR’s assessment methodology two conditions need to be met for results of beach monitoring to indicate “full support” of the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses: (1) the geometric mean of the samples from each recreation season of the three-year assessment period are less than the state’s geometric mean criterion of 126 E.  coli orgs/100 ml and (2) not more than 10% of the samples during any one recreation season exceeds the state’s single-sample maximum value of 235 E.  coli orgs/100 ml.   If a sampling season geometric mean exceeds the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml during the three-year assessment period, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “not supported.”  Also, if significantly more than 10% of the samples in any one of the three recreation seasons exceed Iowa’s single-sample maximum value of 235 E.  coli orgs/100 ml, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “partially supported.”  This assessment approach is based on U.S.   EPA guidelines (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S.   EPA 1997b).    

NOTE:  Based on consultation with EPA Region 7 staff in 2011, IDNR’s methodology for assessing impairments based on the geometric mean water quality criterion was changed.   Prior to the 2012 listing cycle, IDNR calculated geometric means for lakes based on a 30-day periods within the recreational season.   Any violation of one of these 30-day periods within 3 years resulted in an impairment of the Class A1 uses of that lake.   Because water quality standards do not identify a 30 day period but instead a recreational season, Region 7 concurred that the approach used for rivers and streams with less frequent bacteria data (seasonal geometric means) would be appropriate for identifying §303(d) impairments at lake beaches.   Thus, for the 2014 listing cycle, IDNR identified primary contact recreation impairments for lakes when the geometric mean of all samples from the recreation season of a given year exceeded the geometric mean criterion.  This does not impact the way IDNR assesses beaches for closure to protect the recreating public in the short term.  

At Nine Eagles Lake beach, the geometric means from 2010-2012 were all below the Iowa water quality standard of 126 E.  coli orgs/100 ml.   The geometric mean was 76 E.  coli orgs/100 ml in 2010, 29 E.  coli orgs/100 ml in 201, and 11 E.  coli orgs/100 ml in 2012.   The percentage of samples exceeding Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion (235 E.  coli orgs/100 ml) was 29% in 2010, 13% in 2011 and 11% in 2012.   The percentage of samples exceeding the single-sample maximum criterion was significantly greater than 10% in 2010 and therefore suggests impairment of the Class A1 uses.   According to IDNR’s assessment methodology and U.S.  EPA guidelines, these results suggest “partial support” of the Class A1 uses.  

Results from the ISU and UHL lake surveys, however, suggest that the Class A1 uses at Nine Eagles Lake are “fully supported.”  Using the median values from these surveys from 2008-2012 (approximately 14 samples), Carlson’s (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 54, 50, and 52 respectively for Nine Eagles Lake.   According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a and total phosphorus values place Nine Eagles Lake in the eutrophic category.   These values suggest low levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, very good water transparency, and low levels of phosphorus in the water column.  

The level of inorganic suspended solids is low at this lake and does not suggest impairment due to high non-algal turbidity.   The median inorganic suspended solids concentration at Nine Eagles Lake was 2.0 mg/L, and ranked 8th of the 134 monitored lakes.

Data from the 2008-2012 ISU and UHL surveys suggest a small population of cyanobacteria exists at Nine Eagles Lake, which does not suggest impairment at this lake.   These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 88% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake.   The median cyanobacteria wet mass (6.6 mg/L) and ranked 11th of the 134 lakes sampled.  

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed as “fully supported” based on information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau and results from the ISU and UHL lake surveys.   The ISU and UHL lake surveys show that during 2008-2012 there were no violations of the Class B(LW) criterion for ammonia in 14 samples, for dissolved oxygen in 14 samples, or for pH in 14 samples.   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology these results suggest full support of the Class B(LW) uses at Nine Eagles Lake.

The Class C (drinking water) uses are "not assessed" due to lack of monitoring data upon which to base an assessment.   The only parameter collected as part of the ISU and UHL lake surveys relevant to support of Class C (drinking water) uses is nitrate.   While the results of the ISU and UHL surveys from 2008-2012 show that nitrate levels are generally low at this lake (maximum value = .26 mg/l; median = 0.16 mg/l) compared to the drinking water MCL (10 mg/L), these data are not sufficient for developing a valid assessment of support of the Class C uses.    

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” based on results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring at Nine Eagles Lake in 2001, 2005, 2007, and 2009.   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   The level of mercury in the samples of largemouth bass in 2001 (0.26 ppm) exceeded the IDNR/IDPH interim trigger level of 0.20 ppm for a one meal per week consumption advisory.   The level of mercury in the 2001 sample was well below the “do not eat” trigger level for mercury of 1.0 ppm.   According to the IDNR/IDPH advisory protocol, if two consecutive samplings show that contaminant levels are above the trigger level in fillet samples, issuance of a consumption advisory is justified.   Because the level of mercury in sample of largemouth bass fillets from a 2005 follow-up sampling (0.30 ppm) also exceeded this advisory trigger level, issuance of a fish consumption advisory was justified.   This advisory was issued by IDNR and IDPH in January 2006.   [Note:  the advisory threshold for a 1 meal/week consumption advisory was changed form 0.2 ppm to 0.3 ppm in 2007 to be consistent with U.S.  EPA's recommendation for a tissue-based water quality criterion for mercury.]  According to IDNR’s assessment methodology, the existence of a one meal/week consumption advisory indicates that fish consumption uses should be assessed as “partially supported.”  Follow up sampling conducted in 2007 and 2009 also showed that the levels of mercury in largemouth bass (0.412 ppm and 0.534 ppm, respectively) were above the one meal per week consumption advisory.   Therefore the consumption advisory remains at this lake and the fish consumption uses remain assessed as "partially supported."

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/21/2012 Fixed Monitoring End Date
7/30/2009 Fish Tissue Monitoring
5/7/2008 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
10/1/2007 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/1/2005 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/30/2001 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
260 Fish tissue analysis
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Mercury Fish Consumption Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate