Assessment Comments
Assessment is based on: (1) results of water quality monitoring conducted from 2006 through 2008 on Jordan Creek near Bethlehem (station RA-37) by Iowa State University under contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Kansas City District as part of the Rathbun Water Quality Project and (2) results of biological monitoring (fish surveys) conducted by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau from 1999-2002.
Basis for Assessment
Note: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses). Thus, for the current (2010) assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]
SUMMARY: The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria that violate state water quality criteria. The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on (1) results of biological monitoring that suggest impairment of these uses and (2) information in U.S. EPA's May 23, 2006 letter transmitting Iowa's final 2004 Section 303(d) list. These assessments are based on (1) results of water quality monitoring conducted from 2006 through 2008 on Jordan Creek near Bethlehem (station RA-37) by Iowa State University under contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Kansas City District as part of the Rathbun Water Quality Project and (2) results of biological monitoring (fish surveys) conducted by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau from 1999-2002.
EXPLANATION: The presumptive Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of ambient monitoring for indicator bacteria (E. coli). The geometric mean level of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 19 samples collected at station RA-37 during recreational seasons of 2006 through 2008 (1,245 orgs/100ml) far exceeds the Iowa Class A1 water quality criterion of 126 orgs/100ml. Eighteen of the 19 samples (95%) exceed Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and according to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean level of E. coli is greater than the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S. EPA 1997b).
The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting“ based on biological data collected in 1999-2002 as part of an IDNR Fisheries stream sampling project: Chariton research stations. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the Fisheries sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI). The index ranks the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 1999-2002 evaluated FIBI scores were 25 (poor), 26, 37 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI scores with biological assessment criteria established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological assessment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 33. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 1/3 times in the last 10 years.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years between 2004 and 2008 to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 10 years (1999-2008); however, the multiple samples were not collected during 2004-2008. Additionally, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence). According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation). However, despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 5p.
Because the biological impairment of the Class B(WW2) uses is based on an “evaluated” (lower confidence) assessment, the IDNR assessment/listing methodology indicates that this assessment segment should be placed into IR Category 3b (potentially impaired; in need of further investigation). In their May 23, 2006 transmittal letter for Iowa’s 2004 Section 303(d) list, however, U.S. EPA Region 7 informed IDNR that biological impairments based on bioassessment data from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, even though IDNR/UHL bioassessment protocols were not strictly followed, should nonetheless be placed into IR Category 5. Thus, this waterbody was placed into Category 5b of Iowa’s 2006 Integrated Report and will remain on Iowa’s future Section 303(d) lists.
Results of ambient chemical/physical water quality monitoring do not suggest impairments of the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses of this stream segment. Results of monitoring during the 2006-2008 assessment period showed that none of the 22 samples violated Class B(WW2) criteria for dissolved oxygen, and none of the 23 sampled violated the Class B(WW2) criteria for pH. Two of the 19 samples collected at station RA-37 during the 2006-08 period violated Class B(WW2) criteria for ammonia-nitrogen (maximum level = 3.0 mg/l). According to IDNR’s listing methodology, if 10% or less of samples exceed chronic criteria for ammonia, uses should be assessed as “fully supported.” The percentage of the 19 samples in violation of the chronic ammonia criteria (11%) is not significantly greater than 10%; thus, the violations of Iowa’s chronic criteria for ammonia do not suggest impairment.
This stream segment has a history of potential problems with low levels of dissolved oxygen. Levels of dissolved oxygen in recent years, however, appear to have improved. Based on results of recent monitoring, this stream segment does not currently show a dissolved oxygen-related impairment of its Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses.
Although this stream is not designated for Class C drinking water uses, Jordan Creek does flow into Rathbun Reservoir which is used as a source of drinking water for a public water supply. Thus, the seasonal elevation of pesticide levels in this stream and other tributaries of Rathbun Reservoir presents a continuing concern for full support of the Class C (drinking water) uses designated for the Chariton River immediately downriver from Rathbun Reservoir. For example, the mean level of atrazine in the 12 samples collected at Station RA-37 from 2004 through 2006 (1.61 ug/l) is approximately one-half the atrazine MCL of 3.0 ug/l. The maximum level of atrazine during the 2004-06 period (9.0 ug/l) occurred in the sample collected on May 26, 2004. Atrazine was not monitored at Station RA-38 during the 2006-08 period.
