Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

High Lake IA 04-UDM-1304

Emmet County S14T98NR33W 4 mi. ESE of Wallingford.

Cycle
2020
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Stable
Created
8/20/2020 1:40:25 PM
Updated
10/13/2020 1:55:38 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5* - 303(d)-impaired last cycle; fully supporting this cycle; potential de-listing.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class BLW use is assessed as "not supported" (IR 5a) due to high levels of total suspended solids that leads to an impairment of the narrative criteria protecting against undesirable or nuisance aquatic life. High levels of algae at this wetland also suggest impairment due to aesthetically objectionable conditions. All other designated uses are “not assessed”.

Assessment Explanation

Sources of Data:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2017-2018

22320003

High Lake


Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data


Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

22320003

6

5 / 1

8.63

8.04

8.23

0

0%

NO

Evaluated

Full


Class BLW - TSI's

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

22320003

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

10 / 2

31

66

54

NO

Assessor Discretion

Full

22320003

6

Total Phosphorus TSI

10 / 2

63

84

75

NA

NA

NA

22320003

6

Inorganic suspended solids

10 / 2

0.5

48

12.8

NA

NA

NA

  • The TSI value for Secchi depth is not used to evaluate the attainment of aquatic life goals in shallow lakes. Due to the depth of these shallow lakes, TSI values for Secchi depth can be misleading. In some instances, the Secchi disk remains visible at the bottom of the lake and the depth of the lake is recorded as the Secchi depth. In these instances, water clarity may be sufficient to support the Class B(LW) uses, but the index value is limited by the depth of the lake. Thus the combination of total suspended solids and chlorophyll a will be used to determine whether or not the Class B(LW) uses are impaired in these shallow systems.
  • Although the index value for Chlorophyll a is below the impairment trigger of 65 for this assessment cycle, High Lake was listed as partially supporting its Class BLW uses due to aesthetically objectionable conditions. Based on DNR's methodology, the median TSI value for Chlorophyll a must be 63 or less for two consecutive assessment/listing cycles before a lake can be removed from the state's Section 303(d) list (IR Category 5). Therefore, High Lake will remain listed as "not supported" for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle.

Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

22320003

6

Ammonia

5 / 1

0.6548

0.26

0.02

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

22320003

6

Dissolved oxygen

5 / 1

7.95

7.14

7.38

NA / 0

NA / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full

22320003

6

pH

5 / 1

8.63

8.04

8.23

0 / NA

0% / NA

NO

Evaluated

Full

22320003

6

Temperature

5 / 1

26.9

23.4

22.3

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Evaluated

Full


Class BLW - Protection of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median Value >= SAV

Assessment Type

Support Level

22320003

6

Total suspended solids

10 / 2

6

76

33

Yes

Monitored

Not

  • Guidelines for wetland assessment from the Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee’s Water Quality Technical Section (2003) state that an average total suspended solids concentration during the growing season of less than 30 mg/L is necessary to provide sufficient water clarity to support the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation in wetlands and shallow lakes. High levels of total suspended solids impede the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV). Submersed aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of wetland and shallow lake ecosystems. The elimination of SAV can degrade habitat quality such that undesirable aquatic species such as cyanobacteria, common carp and fathead minnows dominate. As such, the suppression of SAV constitutes a violation of Iowa’s narrative water quality criteria protecting against undesirable or nuisance aquatic life.

Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling: No Data


Additional information:

  • Additional monitoring of fish and aquatic vegetation populations at High Lake by DNR staff also suggests that the high levels of total suspended solids and algae have adverse effects on fish populations and limit the production of rooted aquatic vegetation in this wetland. These results further indicate that the aquatic life uses of this wetland should be assessed as "not supported."

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/10/2018
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/16/2013
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)