Ingham Lake IA 04-UDM-1303

Emmet County S12T98NR33W 6 mi E of Wallingford.

Open Data Collection Period Modal

For purposes of developing stream/river water quality assessments for integrated reporting, three years of water quality data are typically used for both conventional pollutant parameters (e.g., indicator bacteria) and the less frequently monitored toxic parameters (e.g., toxic metals). Since the 2004 IR cycle, DNR has used a three-year data gathering period for streams, rivers, and beaches. For most assessments, the use of three years of data increases the number of samples upon which the decision on use support is based and helps address the problem of weather-related year-to-year fluctuations in water quality.

Due to the lower sampling frequency in Iowa’s ambient lake, biological, fish kill, and fish tissue monitoring programs, five years of data are used for developing IR assessments and for identifying Section 303(d) listings.

Data Type	Data Timeframe
Beach Sampling Data	CY 2018 - 2020
Stream/River Water Quality Data	CY 2018 - 2020
Lake Water Quality Data	CY 2016 - 2020
Biological Sampling Data	CY 2016 - 2020*
Fish Kill Data	CY 2016 - 2020
Fish Tissue Sampling Data	CY 2016 - 2020
Continuous Dissolved Oxygen Sampling Data	CY 2016 - 2020
*Biological sites sampled in both 2015 and 2019 were also assessed.

Open Segment Map
View assessment methodology in new window

Cycle: 2022
Release Status: Final
Overall IR: 4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
Trophic: Hypereutrophic
Trend: Stable
Created: 12/30/2021 10:58:38 AM
Updated: 1/27/2022 11:11:50 AM

Use Support

Class A1

Recreation - Primary contact

Not Supported

Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a

Support Level

Not Supported

Impairment Code

4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.

Cause Magnitude

High

Status

Continuing

Source

Natural: Internal Nutrient Recycling (Primarily Lakes)

Source Confidence

High

Cycle Added

2002

Impairment Rationale

Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions

Data Source

Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes

Turbidity

Support Level

Not Supported

Impairment Code

4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.

Cause Magnitude

High

Status

Continuing

Source

Other: Sediment Resuspension

Source Confidence

Moderate

Cycle Added

1998

Impairment Rationale

Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions

Data Source

Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes

Algal Growth: Noxious Aquatic Plants - Algae

Support Level

Further Investigation Needed

Impairment Code

3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.

Cause Magnitude

Moderate

Status

Continuing

Source

Natural: Internal Nutrient Recycling (Primarily Lakes)

Source Confidence

Moderate

Cycle Added

2004

Impairment Rationale

Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions

Data Source

Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR Fisheries

Class BLW

Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands

WINOFI

Algal Growth: Cyanobacteria

Support Level

Further Investigation Needed

Impairment Code

3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.

Cause Magnitude

Slight

Status

Continuing

Source

Natural: Internal Nutrient Recycling (Primarily Lakes)

Source Confidence

N/A

Cycle Added

2020

Impairment Rationale

Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities

Data Source

Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes

Class HH

Human Health -

Not Assessed

Impairment Delistings

No delistings for this assessment cycle.

Documentation

Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by nuisance algae blooms and non-algal turbidity. Large populations of cyanobacteria suggested a potential additional impairment of the Class A1 use due to the presence of nuisance (noxious) aquatic plant life. The Class BLW use was assessed (evaluated) as “WINOFI" due to nuisance blooms of algae. All other designated uses were “not assessed.” Note: A TMDL for algae and turbidity at Ingham Lake was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in 2005. Because all Section 303(d) impairments identified for the 2016 assessment/listing cycle (algae, pH, turbidity) are addressed by the TMDL, this waterbody is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source	Data Source ID	Data Type	Data Age	Site ID	Site Name	Site Description
Iowa DNR	6	WQ	CY 2016-2019	22320001	Ingham Lake

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data

Class A1 - pH:

Site ID	Data Source ID	# Samples / # Years	Minimum Value	Maximum Value	Mean Value	# Violations	Violations needed for impairment	Violates Significantly >10% Rule?	Assessment Type	Support Level
22320001	6	12 / 4	7.7	9	8.5	0	4	NO	Monitored	Full

Class A1 - Lake TSI's

Site ID	Data Source ID	Parameter Name	# Samples / # Years	Minimum Value	Maximum Value	Median Value	Median TSI Violation?	Assessment Type	Support Level
22320001	6	Chlorophyll a TSI	12 / 4	39	80	66	YES	Monitored	Not
22320001	6	Secchi TSI	12 / 4	50	83	77	YES	Monitored	Not
22320001	6	Total Phosphorus TSI	12 / 4	64	84	75	NA	NA	NA
22320001	6	Inorganic suspended solids	12 / 4	0.3	28	4	NA	NA	NA

Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID	Data Source ID	Parameter Name	# Samples / # Years	Minimum Value	Maximum Value	Mean Value	# Violations	# Acute / Chronic Violations	Violations needed for impairment	Violates Significantly >10% Rule?	Assessment Type	Support Level
22320001	6	Ammonia	12 / 4	0.0003	0.627	0.13	NA	0 / 0	4	NO	Monitored	Full
22320001	6	Dissolved Oxygen	12 / 4	4.3	13.6	9.5	1	NA / NA	4	NO	Monitored	Full
22320001	6	pH	12 / 4	7.7	9	8.5	0	NA / NA	4	NO	Monitored	Full
22320001	6	Temperature	12 / 4	17.2	28.2	23.2	0	NA / NA	4	NO	Monitored	Full

Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria:

Site ID	Data Source ID	# Samples	Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass	Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition	Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass	Median Cyanobacteria % Composition	Median Cyanobacteria Concentration = 75th Percentile	Assessment Type	Support Level
22320001	6	6	438.22	98.6%	42.37	95.9%	YES	Evaluated	3b

Class HH: No Data

Monitoring and Methods

Assessment Key Dates

5/31/2016

Non-fixed Monitoring Start Date

9/4/2019

Non-fixed Monitoring End Date

8/16/2007

Fish Kill

1/13/2005

TMDL Completed

Methods

120

Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals

140

Incidence of spills and/or fish kills

222

Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)

340

Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)