Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR

ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Beaver Creek IA 04-UDM-1292

mouth (S32 T91N R28W Humboldt Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in S28 T91N R28W Humboldt Co.

Overall IR
3 - Insufficient data exist to determine whether any designated uses are met.
Trend
Unknown
Created
11/1/2023 8:14:05 AM by
Updated
1/9/2024 8:07:43 AM by
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BWW2
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 2
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
303(d) Listing Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
1998
Impairment Rationale
Potential Impairment
Data Source
Special project/study: Iowa DNR
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class BWW2 use was assessed as "WINOFI" based on historical biological sampling data and habitat assessment. All other designated uses were "not assessed."

Assessment Explanation

Presumptive Class A1 - No Data

Class BWW2 - Biological Sampling:

The Class BWW2 aquatic life use was assessed (evaluated) as "WINOFI" due to (1) very low fish community diversity (4 species from 2 families) for streams in the Des Moines Lobe sub-ecoregion (47b) and (2) presence of very few of the expected fish taxa (2 of 11) for streams in the 47b sub-ecoregion. Although results of fish sampling were negatively influenced by the difficulty of seining in several rocky and snag-filled pools, the results suggest a potential water quality problem, especially considering the relatively high quality aquatic habitats present at the assessment site. Follow-up monitoring is still needed in this stream reach to determine the status of aquatic communities and habitats and to determine the degree to which the aquatic life use may be impaired. Although the sampling of the fish community was negatively affected by large rocks and other debris in the stream, the low diversity suggests that follow-up monitoring should be conducted to better determine the status of the aquatic communities and habitats and to determine whether the aquatic life use is impaired. The field sheet did not indicate any significant impacts to the physical characteristics of this stream. Follow-up monitoring is still needed in this stream reach to determine the status of aquatic communities and habitats and to determine the degree to which the aquatic life use may be impaired.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/1/1994
Biological Monitoring
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
330
Fish surveys