Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

North Branch Lizard Creek IA 04-UDM-1288

mouth (S2 T91N R31W Pocahontas Co.) to confluence with Drainage Ditch No. 169 in S6 T91N R31W Pocahontas Co.

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
Class B(LR)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 3b
Legacy ADBCode
IA 04-UDM-0327_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on results of a September 1994 IDNR stream use assessment.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of biological monitoring and habitat assessment conducted as part of the IDNR stream use assessment in September 1994.   Although the data upon which this assessment were originally based have aged beyond 10 years--and are thus considered too old to characterize current water quality conditions--the indication of a potential impairment suggests that this stream segment should remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" and thus remain in Category 3b of Iowa’s 2006 Integrated Report (I.e., on Iowa's list of waters in need of further investigation).   The assessment developed for the 2004 assessment/listing cycle is included below.

EXPLANATION:  Continue to use the assessment developed for the 1998 and 2000 reporting cycles that was based on results of the 1994 IDNR stream use assessment.   As stated in the assessment developed for the 1998 reporting cycle, the Class B(LR) aquatic life uses were assessed as "partially supported"  due to (1) presence of a relatively depauperate fish community (7 species from 2 families) for streams in the Des Moines Lobe subecoregion, (2) presence of less than a majority of the expected fish taxa (4 of 11) for streams in this subregion, and (3) indications on the field sheet of extensive channel alterations due to channelization and generally poor quality aquatic habitats.   Follow-up monitoring was recommended to determine the status of the aquatic communities and habitats of this stream and to determine the degree to which the Class B(LR) uses may be impaired.   Because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is changed from "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively high confidence) to "evaluated" (indicating an assessment with relatively low confidence).   Follow-up monitoring is needed in this stream reach to determine the status of aquatic communities and habitats and to determine the degree to which the Class B(LR) uses may be impaired.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/1/1994 DNR Stream Use Assessment
9/1/1994 Biological Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
375 Visual observation-- may not quantify some parameters-- single season-- by prof.
Monitoring Levels
Biological 2
Habitat 3
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Channelization
  • Moderate