Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

White Fox Creek IA 04-UDM-1261

mouth (S33 T89N R25W Hamilton Co.) to Hamilton/Wright county line at N line SS3 T89N R25W Hamilton Co.

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/16/2019 7:41:01 AM
Updated
8/1/2019 8:06:36 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BWW2
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 2
Fully Supported
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2000, 2009 and 2013.

Assessment Explanation

The aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting” based on biological data collected in 2000, 2009 and 2013 as part of the DNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. The 2000, 2009 and 2013 FIBI scores were 48 (fair), 64 (good) and 75 (excellent). The 2000, 2009 and 2013 BMIBI scores were 54 (fair), 63 and 69 (both good). The aquatic life use support was assessed as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 53 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 2/3 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/3 times in the past 17 years.

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 DNR assessment methodology. DNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a recent five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples but the multiple samples were not collected in the most recent five year period (2012-2016).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/30/2000
Biological Monitoring
7/29/2009
Biological Monitoring
10/3/2013
Biological Monitoring
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330
Fish surveys
380
Quantitative physical habitat assessment