Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Big Creek Lake IA 04-UDM-1242

Polk County S22T81NR25W near Polk City

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
10/12/2018 2:25:50 PM
Updated
1/30/2019 4:01:23 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Single-sample maximum criterion exceeded in significantly > 10% of samples
Data Source
Beach monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 1
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2016
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to violations of the state water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. The Class B(WW-1) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” due to information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau suggesting that algae blooms are becoming more frequent at this lake. Fish consumption uses are considered “not assessed” due to the age of the data upon which the previous assessment (“fully supported”) was based. Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of IDNR/UHL beach monitoring from 2014 through 2016, (2) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2012 through 2016 by Iowa State University (ISU), (3) results of the TMDL monitoring conducted in 2013, 2015, and 2016 by Iowa Department of Natural resources (IDNR) (4) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, and (5) results of EPA/DNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring in 2004

Assessment Explanation

Results of DNR beach monitoring from 2014 through 2016 suggest that the Class A1 uses are "partially supported." Levels of indicator bacteria at Big Creek Beach were monitored once per week during the primary contact recreation seasons (May through September) of 2014 (16 samples), 2015 (18 samples) and 2016 (17 samples), as part of the DNR beach monitoring program. According to DNR’s assessment methodology two conditions need to be met for results of beach monitoring to indicate “full support” of the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses: (1) the geometric mean of the samples from each recreation season of the three-year assessment period are less than the state's geometric mean criterion of 126 E. coli orgs/100 ml and (2) not more than 10% of the samples during any one recreation season exceeds the state's single-sample maximum value of 235 E. coli orgs/100 ml. If a sampling season geometric mean exceeds the state criterion of 1000 orgs/100 ml during the three-year assessment period, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “not supported.” Also, if a sampling season geometric mean exceeds the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml during the three-year assessment period and/or if significantly more than 10% of the samples in any one of the three recreation seasons exceed Iowa's single-sample maximum value of 235 E. coli orgs/100 ml, the Class A1 uses should be assessed as “partially supported.” This assessment approach is based on U.S. EPA guidelines (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b).

At Big Creek Beach, the geometric means from 2014, 2015 and 2016 were all below the Iowa water quality standard of 126 E. coli orgs/100 ml. The geometric mean was 85 E. coli orgs/100 ml in 2014, 65 E. coli orgs/100 ml in 2015 and 44 E. coli orgs/100 ml in 2016. The percentage of samples exceeding Iowa's single-sample maximum criterion (235 E. coli orgs/100 ml) was 13% in 2014, 22% in 2015 and 29% in 2016. The number of samples exceeding the single-sample maximum criterion was significantly greater than 10% in 2015 and 2016. According to DNR's assessment methodology and U.S. EPA guidelines, these results suggest "partially supported" of the Class A1 uses.

For the 2018 assessment/listing cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses of Big Creek Lake are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on information from the ISU lake survey and Iowa DNR TMDL monitoring. Using the median values from these surveys from 2012-2016 (approximately 15 samples), Carlson 's (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 52, 58, and 64 respectively for Big Creek Lake. According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus values all place Big Creek Lake in the Eutrophic category. These values suggest relatively low levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, very good water transparency, and moderately high levels of phosphorus in the water column. The data show no violations of the Class A1 criterion for pH in 15 samples.

The level of inorganic suspended solids was low at Big Creek Lake, and does not suggest water quality problems due to non-algal turbidity. The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Big Creek Lake (1.6 mg/L) was ranked 9th among the 138 lakes by the ISU lake survey.

Data from the 2012-2016 ISU lake survey suggest a small population of cyanobacteria exists at Big Creek Lake. These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 78% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake. The median cyanobacteria wet mass (3.2 mg/L) was ranked 26th of the 138 lakes sampled.

The Class B(WW-1) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” based on information from the DNR Fisheries Bureau and results from the ISU lake surveys. Based on information from the DNR Fisheries Bureau, large cyanobacteria blooms have formed on the lake every summer in recent years and it has deterred recreation. Additionally, issues in the watershed and well established common carp population have led to decreased water quality. Results of the ISU lake survey from 2012-2016 show there were no violations of the criterion for ammonia in 15 samples(0%), one violation of the criterion for dissolved oxygen in 15 samples(7%), and no violations of the criterion for pH in 15 samples(0%). Based on DNR's assessment methodology these violations are not significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore suggest (fully supported/monitored) of the Class B(LW) uses of Big Creek Lake

The level of support of the Class HH-fish consumption uses is changed from “fully supporting” to “not assessed” due to the age of the data upon which the previous assessment was based. The previous assessment was based on results of U.S. EPA / DNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring at Big Creek Lake in 2004. The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and largemouth bass had low levels of contaminants. Because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence). The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2004 RAFT sampling conducted in this lake show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Note 1: The DNR TMDL for the impairment due to indicator bacteria at this lake was approved by U.S. EPA in August 2011. Because this TMDL addresses all of the impairments identified for this lake, this lake is moved from IR Category 5a (impaired; TMDL required) to IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/21/2012
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/29/2016
Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/17/2004
Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/24/2011
TMDL Completed
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
260
Fish tissue analysis
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring